I would think it would be their exportation of precious resources such as diamonds, but i could be wrong about this
Answer:
Yes. Southam's research was "more wrong"
Explanation:
They both didn't seek the informed consent of their patients and we're both wrong. However, Southam injected patients(both healthy and unhealthy) with cancerous cells to see how their bodies would react. This was terribly wrong seeing that he put unsuspecting patients in danger. Elsie on the other hand, collected tissue samples from his patients to conduct his research which is a clear violation of their rights but clearly not as deadly as Southam's.
Definitely D , hope that helps
The farmers used crop irrigation to produce a food surplus for the Egyptians to eat and save for their families. The artisans would make pottery for the community. The scribes would read and write records.
<span>The farmers had the lowest status on the Egyptian social pyramid. The scribes and artisans were in the middle status. Most of the people in Egypt were farmers. This was important so that everyone was well fed. Artisans were important because no one knew how to make pottery as well as them. Scribes were known for keeping letters and writing. That is why each position was very important.</span>
I believe it would be an example of social conformity
