Example 1:
The pros of Orthographic is that they can show hidden details and all of the connecting parts, they can be annotated to display material and finishes. The pros of Isometric projection is that they dont need many views and it gives accuracy, cons are is created a unorginized apperance by the lack of foreshortening, I would choose Isometric projection because it shows the size of the figure.
Example 2:
Orthographic projection is a good option for showing lots of detail and small things. The limitation is that with all of that detail, they can become quite messy and hard to understand to someone new to them. However, that is one of the pros of Isometric projection. It gives easy detail and is just as good as an Orthographic. Personally, I find Isometric projections easier to interpret.
Answer:
-9
Step-by-step explanation:
You have to plug 8 into the formula for x. f(8) = -2(8)+7 = -16+7 = -9
Answer:
<em>Expected Payoff ⇒ $ 1.50 ; Type in 1.50</em>
Step-by-step explanation:
Considering that 1 out of the 100 tickets will have a probability of winning a 150 dollar prize, take a proportionality into account;
<em>Thus, Solution ; Expected Payoff ⇒ $ 1.50</em>
Answer:
Given the function: y=f(x) = 3x+2
when x=-2 at the beginning of the interval [-2, 5],
then;
y = 3x+2 begins at
y= 3(-2)+2 = -6+2= -4.
and
when x=5 at the end of the interval [-2, 5],
y = 3x+2 ends up at
y= 3(5)+2 = 15+2= 17.
So,
y has changed -4 to 17, which is a change of 17-(-4)= 17+4 = 21
and x has changed from -2 to 5, which is a change of 5-(-2)=5+2=7
So, the average rate of change of y with respect to x over the interval
[-2, 5] is given by ;
=
Therefore, the average rate of change y with respect to x over the interval is, 3
Step-by-step explanation:
The problem given above can be solved through the concept of permutation because of the importance of the arrangements. This may be solved through calculators directly by keying in,
10P5
That is, the permutation of 10 taken 5. The answer to this permutation is 30,240.
