Answer:
D
Step-by-step explanation:
So you start with $2.65 and a variable y. What we will do is work without the dollar and keep it for the end as it quite disturbs and work our way while keeping the y. So first we have 2.65. Now it rose by y so. The price = 2.65 + y. Then it dropped by 0.15. So 2.65 + y - 0.15. Here you see we have like terms so we reduce and get 2.50 + y. Now it rose by 0.05. So 2.50 + y + 0.05. Again, like terms, reduce. 2.55 + y. There you go with the answer.
One of the major advantage of the two-condition experiment has to do with interpreting the results of the study. Correct scientific methodology does not often allow an investigator to use previously acquired population data when conducting an experiment. For example, in the illustrative problem involving early speaking in children, we used a population mean value of 13.0 months. How do we really know the mean is 13.0 months? Suppose the figures were collected 3 to 5 years before performing the experiment. How do we know that infants haven’t changed over those years? And what about the conditions under which the population data were collected? Were they the same as in the experiment? Isn’t it possible that the people collecting the population data were not as motivated as the experimenter and, hence, were not as careful in collecting the data? Just how were the data collected? By being on hand at the moment that the child spoke the first word? Quite unlikely. The data probably were collected by asking parents when their children first spoke. How accurate, then, is the population mean?
The expression i determined is 10x + 6
I think it might be expression one =14 i think and number 2 is obviously is 19 but you would put parenthesis around 5+4_2+6
I think i did this right its been a while since i did this