Answer:
1 Shirt and 185cm remaining cloth
Step-by-step explanation:
2m and 15cm = 215cm
40m = 400cm
400/215=1.860465116
A shirt cant be in decimal so we remove the decimals, and take the as the answer. For the decimals, they are the remaining cloth.. to calculate the amount of remaining cloth we do:
1.860465116-1
=860465116
215*860465116=185cm
Answer:
ask siri
Step-by-step explanation:
go to your phone
go to siri
and then ask her
Answer:
![\sqrt[4] {x^3}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%20%7Bx%5E3%7D)
Step-by-step explanation:
At this point, we can transform the square root into a fourth root by squaring the argument, and bring into the other root:
![\sqrt x \cdot \sqrt[4] x =\sqrt [4] {x^2} \cdot \sqrt[4] x = \sqrt[4]{x^2\cdot x} = \sqrt[4] {x^3}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Csqrt%20x%20%5Ccdot%20%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%20x%20%3D%5Csqrt%20%5B4%5D%20%7Bx%5E2%7D%20%5Ccdot%20%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%20x%20%3D%20%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7Bx%5E2%5Ccdot%20x%7D%20%3D%20%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%20%7Bx%5E3%7D)
Alternatively, if you're allowed to use rational exponents, we can convert everything:
![\sqrt x \cdot \sqrt[4] x = x^{\frac12} \cdot x^\frac14 = x^{\frac12 +\frac14}= x^{\frac24 +\frac14}= x^\frac34 = \sqrt[4] {x^3}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Csqrt%20x%20%5Ccdot%20%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%20x%20%3D%20x%5E%7B%5Cfrac12%7D%20%5Ccdot%20x%5E%5Cfrac14%20%3D%20x%5E%7B%5Cfrac12%20%2B%5Cfrac14%7D%3D%20x%5E%7B%5Cfrac24%20%2B%5Cfrac14%7D%3D%20x%5E%5Cfrac34%20%3D%20%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%20%7Bx%5E3%7D)
Answer:
1.) Yes
2.) Yes
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that
n = k(k + 7)
If k is a positive integer and n = k(k + 7), is n divisible by 6 ?
(1) k is odd. Yes.
Let assume that k = 3
Then, n = 3(3 + 7)
n = 3 × 10
n = 30.
30 is divisible by 6.
(2) When k is divided by 3, the remainder is 2. That is,
Let k = 5
Then,
5/3 = 1 remainder 2
Substitute k into the equation
n = k(k + 7)
n = 5(5 + 7)
n = 5 × 12
n = 60
And 60 is divisible by 6.
Therefore, the answer to both questions is Yes.
Answer:
see below
Step-by-step explanation:
a) w <= 40 lbs
b) Do you have any bag that weigh 0 lbs or negative lbs?
We need to rewrite the inequality so that these are not there
0<= w <= 40 lbs