When capital adequacy line is equal to the savings per worker function then "normal expected returns to investor".
<h3>What is
capital adequacy/requirement ratio?</h3>
The capital adequacy ratio (CAR) gauges a bank's level of capital retention in relation to its level of risk. The CAR of banks must be monitored by national regulators in order to ascertain how well it can withstand an acceptable amount of loss.
The components of capital adequacy are-
- The Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR) aims to ensure that banks have an adequate amount of capital to safeguard depositors' funds.
- (Tier 1 Capital + Tier 2 Capital) / Risk-Weighted Assets is the calculation for CAR.
- The BIS's capital standards have tightened up in recent years.
- By reducing the likelihood of bank insolvency, capital adequacy ratios promote the effectiveness and stability of a country's financial system.
- A bank with a high capital adequacy ratio is typically thought to be secure and likely to fulfill its financial obligations.
The principle of capital adequacy are-
- High-quality and loss-absorbing capital are both necessary.
- The Basel III criteria for common stock, along with supplementary tier 1 and tier 2 capital, are applied to establish the quality of capital, with retained earnings being the most important factor.
To know more about the capital requirement, here
brainly.com/question/13676980
#SPJ4
Answer:
Null Hypothesis : Average Weld Time = 1.919 ;
Alternate Hypothesis : Average Weld Time ≠ 1.919
Explanation:
Null Hypothesis is a neutral 'no effect' hypothesis, signifying no relationship between variables.
Alternate Hypothesis is reverse of Null Hypothesis , signifying effect & relationship between variables.
Given Case : Production Line Closed - If average weld time used by robot ≠ 1.919 ; Production Line not Closed - If average weld time used by robot = 1.919
Null Hypothesis : Average Weld Time = 1.919 ;
Alternate Hypothesis : Average Weld Time ≠ 1.919
Answer:
C Taxation without representation is tyranny
Explanation:
Yes it did set up the 1 set up
Answer:
The correct answer is : Use of time-outs to remove the positive reinforcement
Explanation:
The strategy is to separate the offending student from the rest of the class with the purpose to give them the opportunity to use his or her right to learn. This removal is in order to take out the child from all reinforcement, immediately stopping the behavior and it has to be brief.
