Look at the picture.
<h3>Answer: d. (-3, 1)</h3>
Answer:
It is correct according to the laws
Answer: b. Only statement (ii) is correct.
Step-by-step explanation:
The given five-number summary of the ages of passengers on a cruise ship is listed below.
Min 1
20 Median 29
38 Max 80
Inter-quartile range = 
- According to the 1.5(IQR) criterion for outliers : An data value is an outlier if it lies below
or above
.
Here , 

Since the minimum value>
( ∵ 1 > -7)
It means there is no value below
, so there is no low -outlier.
⇒ Statement (i) "here is at least one passenger whose age is a low outlier. " is false.
But the maximum value >
(∵ 85 > 65)
It means there are values above
.
⇒Statement (ii) "There is at least one passenger whose age is a high outlier" is true.
Hence, the correct answer is b. Only statement (ii) is correct.
Step-by-step explanation:
The slope of the given line is -3. Since perpendicular lines have slopes that are negative reciprocals of each other, the slope of the line we need to find is 1/3.
Substituting into point slope form, we get:
y + 6 = ⅓(x+6)
Sad to say it is likely D. If you are in the United States, I wouldn't know what deductions are available, but here are some possibilities.
1. Gladys is a single Mom. She gets to deduct her child.
2. Gladys owns her own home and gets to deduct her municipal tax. Michelle is renting and may be able to deduct something but not as much.
3. Gladys gets to deduct medical expenses. Michelle does not.
4. Gladys has a travelling allowance that is deductible. Michelle does not.
5. Gladys goes to church and tithes. Michelle does not.
6. Gladys has a registered savings plan. Michelle does not.
The problem is that the two women might very well be in a different tax bracket when all the deductions are considered. That depends on how the US system works. I don't think you are supposed to choose A. All other things being equal, they should be in the same tax bracket.
I don't see how B would come about. Usually state is dependent on Federal (it is in Canada anyway).
C is definitely wrong unless the savings plan is registered. Any savings plan that produces dividends or interest that is not registered is taxable.