Falsifying data in order to make the findings consistent with predetermined points of view would demonstrate a lack of research integrity.
Falsification is defined as "altering or omitting data or outcomes so that the research is not accurately represented in the research record, manipulating research supplies, equipment, or methods, or both."
It is often believed that scientists are more inclined to fabricate and falsify data when they are under publication pressure, when social controls are absent, when they operate in nations without laws addressing scientific misconduct, and when they are male.
Research misconduct is forbidden by the American government and is defined as "fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism in proposing, doing, reviewing, or reporting research, or in reporting research results."
Learn more about falsifying here:
brainly.com/question/25240670
#SPJ4
Answer:A.) Quietly and carefully evaluate the situation and keep your emotions under control. Be as unhurried as you can.
Explanation: What I consider to be most appropriate in such scenario is to be calm and calculated due to certain reasons, such as, The presence of the police shows that, if an imminent attack had been spotted, the cops at the scene would have reacted, the context says the scene is safe, and the man on the counter was repeatedly singing a birthday song. With all these, careful evaluation without hurry is required, there is no need to rush or be emotional. it could just be a surprise birthday call, who knows.
joe is winning so thats good. the election isn't over yet, we're still waiting for nevada, georgia, north carolina, pennsylvania, and alaska. joe has 264 electoral votes and trump only has 214.you need 270 to win. (btw an electoral vote isn't the same as a normal vote for the president) biden2020