1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Delicious77 [7]
2 years ago
10

Match the correct term with definition

Law
1 answer:
marin [14]2 years ago
7 0

a tort is a wrongful act or an infringement of a right (other than under contract) leading to civil legal liability

Compensatory damages are money awarded to a plaintiff to compensate for damages, injury, or another incurred loss

tortfeasor is a person who commits a tort.

Respondeat superior is a doctrine that a party is responsible for acts of their agents.

An intentional tort is a category of torts that describes a civil wrong resulting from an intentional act on the part of the tortfeasor.

negligence is failure to take proper care in doing something.

strict liability is liability which does not depend on actual negligence or intent to harm.
You might be interested in
This is my gov/econ quiz, pls help
tino4ka555 [31]
6.A
7.B
8.D
9. Either B or C
4 0
3 years ago
because the framers of the united states constitution (written in 1787) believed that protecting property rights relating to inv
ser-zykov [4K]

Because the framers of the United States Constitution (written in 1787) believed that protecting property rights relating to inventions would encourage the new nation’s economic growth, they gave Congress—the national legislature—a constitutional mandate to grant patents for inventions. The resulting patent system has served as a model for those in other nations. Recently, however, scholars have questioned whether the American system helped achieve the framers’ goals. These scholars have contended that from 1794 to roughly 1830, American inventors were unable to enforce property rights because judges were “anticipate” and routinely invalidated patents for arbitrary reasons. This argument is based partly on examination of court decisions in cases where patent holders (“patentees”) brought suit alleging infringement of their patent rights. In the 1820s, for instance, 75 percent of verdicts were decided against the patentee. The proportion of verdicts for the patentee began to increase in the 1830s, suggesting to these scholars that judicial attitudes toward patent rights began shifting then.

To learn more about protecting property rights visit here ; brainly.com/question/28388414?referrer=searchResults

#SPJ4

4 0
1 year ago
Who rpssssssssssssssssssssssssssss
atroni [7]

Answer:

me

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Why are some rights more important than other rights.
loris [4]

Answer:

Well gay  rights are not really awsome

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Select the correct answer.
dangina [55]
D. A security guard
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Elin contracts to buy six cases of vintage Fertile Valley wine from Grapes & Vines Winery for $1,200. The contract states th
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following is an exception to the hearsay rule?
    9·1 answer
  • How the Bill of Rights is supposed to protect defendants from situations like the Scottsboro boys case. What has happened betwee
    14·1 answer
  • What is the difference between probation supervision and intensive probation supervision
    14·1 answer
  • Do you think defendants in George Floyd case should be tried together or separately and why
    13·1 answer
  • If I commit a war crime during a civil war, would it be called a war crime or a civil war crime?
    13·1 answer
  • Okay so this isn’t for homework, I was just curious.
    15·2 answers
  • The development of fundamental rights protection in the EU
    11·1 answer
  • Here is the information Jordan has found about several different arson charges.
    6·1 answer
  • Why can't you call the number for this
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!