Hi there!
The principle of SOCIAL CONFORMITY.
It showed that people tend to engage behaviours more likely in confirmation of the society at large.
The interesting question is when everybody is thinking about confirming then who decide what behavior to engage in, from the start? That is if we are supposed to DRINK in a Social gathering when all are drinking. Then who thought that Drinking is to be done by all, or who sets the social norm and how is the degree of strictness understood and enforced?
is it something we just think and that the norms doesn't actually exist?
Some food for thought!
hope it make sense!
The rule of law has been linked to a number of positive social outcomes, including higher rates of economic growth, less violence, reduced inequality, better health, and higher literacy.
More detail about this is provided below.
<h3>Just what are the benefits of a government based on the rule of law?</h3>
One of the many advantages of a society based on the Rule of law is that it helps to protect the judicial system's autonomy. Modern conceptions of the Rule of Law involve safeguarding the judicial system's impartiality.
This indicates that wherever the Rule of Law functions in the true and contemporary meaning of the term, there is an increase in the independence of the judicial system.
Stronger economic growth, more peace, less inequality, better health outcomes, and more educational opportunities have all been linked to the rule of law.
You may learn more about the concept of rule of law at this link: brainly.com/question/12469633
#SPJ1.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached we can say the following.
Do the economic benefits of free trade outweigh the social costs?
Not really, and it all depends on the perspective.
From the big companies and industrial side, free trade has been a success. Free trade has allowed thousands of companies to export their goods with cero import tariffs, benefiting the income. It has allowed multinational companies to go abroad and establishing branches in different parts of the world, basically in underdeveloped nations.
Once there, they paid very low salaries, much less than what they should have paid in their former countries, That is a reason why they moved to underdeveloped countries. So cheap labor is one reason. And other these multinational companies freely exploit the many raw materials and natural resources of that underdeveloped country.
Meanwhile, free trade makes rich people and corporations richer, and poor countries and poor people continue to be as poor as they have always been. No serious progress at all,
The evolution of social mores in the 1920s is probably one of the most impactful aspect of the Roaring 20s.
While these changes were primarily centered in the urban areas of the United States, they allowed people to begin to move past restrictive Protestant moral values and move to a more open society.
This was done in combination with the explosion of cultural contributions made by African-Americans, centered around the Harlem Renaissance.
Answer:
correct fill up is Suspension
Explanation:
solution
Implied Consent Origin in 1965 to 1970
according to Implied Consent Law you taken the blood alcohol content tests
implied consent is subjected to a test to find out whether we are driving under the influence of alcohol or any other substances
and generally they submit to a field sobriety test or breathalyzer test in some case blood test
we can also legally arrest by the officer who suspect influence
so correct fill up is Suspension
