Answer:
C. 2.23.
Step-by-step explanation:
It's not more than 2.3 and not less than 2.2. Considering the fact that it's closer to 2 and two tenths rather than 2 and three tenths implies that it's a little over 2.2.
If you are mowing a section of a lawn but want to make sure you only mow so much. Say half of a square lawn, if you know that the 2 sides of the fence are each 20 yards in length, you can apply the formula to find the distance of the diagonal. That way you know exactly how much you have mowed. draw a square, cut a diagonal through it, make the 2 sides labaled as 20 and then its 20 squared plus 20 squared = c squared. Hope this helps!
Answer:
The answer is 3
Step-by-step explanation:
This expression of yours is problematic in that it's difficult to know which math operations are intended and in which order. In <span>x/2 x-2/4 x-2/2 , which part of the expression is in the numerator, and which in the denominator?
x shows up 3 times. Apparently you meant "the variable x" in "x/2." What about the next "x?" Did you type that in to indicate multiplication or is that "x" a variable also? I think you catch my drift: Your post will need some editing before your readers can understand what you want to do here.
Suppose I interpret your </span><span>x/2 x-2/4 x-2/2 to mean the following:
( x/2 )
---------- * (x-2/2). If that wasn't your intent, please fix it.
x - 2/4
If this interpretation is correct, then you have
x(x-1) 2x(x-1)
---------------- = ------------. If not, please fix it. This rational function
x-1/2 2x -1 cannot be reduced.</span>
