Answer:
The equation of the line will be:
Step-by-step explanation:
Given the points
Finding the slope
We know that the value of y-intercept can be obtained by setting x=0, and solving for y
Here,
at x = 0, the value of y = 0
Thus,
y-intercept = b = 0
We know the slope-intercept form of the line equation is
where m is the slope and b is the y-intercept
now substituting m = 0 and b = 0 in the slope-intercept form
y = mx+b
y = 0(x) + (0)
y = 0+0
y = 0
Therefore, the equation of line will be:
Answer:
15
Step-by-step explanation:
Co-efficient = number multiplied by a variable
The only number multiplied by a variable is 15, therefore, it's the co-efficient.
Learn more;work harder
#Carryonlearning
<u>===============================================================</u>
2/18 + 1 2/8 =
1/9 + 10/8 =
1/9 + 5/4 =
4/36 + 45/36 =
49/36 =
1 13/36 <==
Answer: The question is incomplete
Step-by-step explanation: The answer to this question cannot be determined correctly since an important detail is missing.
However, let me explain how you would normally go about it by using an example of mine. If for example the ratio of yes votes to no votes was 8 to 5, and the question requires you to calculate how many yes votes were there as indicated in your question, then the first step would be to find the total number of both sides of the ratio. That is add 8 to 5 which gives you 13. This means if there was a total of 13 votes cast, every yes vote stands for 8 out of 13 votes and every no vote stands for 5 out of 13 votes.
To express it mathematically, every yes vote would be 8/13 of the total (12779) and every no vote would be 5/13 of the total (12779).
Therefore to determine how many yes votes there was, is calculated as follows;
Let yes votes be y and no votes be x'
y = (8/13) * 12779
y = 102232/13
y = 7864
<em>Based on my example that the ratio of yes votes to no votes is 8 to 5, </em>
Then the number of yes votes was 7,864.
Answer:
we can conclude that there is no significant evidence to conclude that the mean score in 2010 differs from the mean score in 2009.
Step-by-step explanation:
H0 : μ = 582
H1 : μ < 582
Test statistic :
T = (xbar - μ) ÷ σ/√n
Xbar = 515 ; n = 20 ; σ = 120
T = (515 - 582) ÷ 120/√20
T = -67 / 26.832815
T = 2.50
Pvalue at t score = 2.50 ; df = 19 is 0.0187
At α = 0.0187
Pvalue > α ; Hence, we fail to reject the Null
Hence, we can conclude that there is no significant evidence to conclude that the mean score in 2010 differs from the mean score in 2009.
