Answer:
True
Explanation:
In the Daubert case, The case is tainted because the defendant provided 'expert witness' to give testimony in the favor, but the testimonies that given contradict the common scientific knowledge that is held by scientific community. Even though this happen, the juries still rule in favor of the defendant simply because they brought 'an expert'.
To prevent this from happening again, the supreme court created rule 702 which restrict the type of expert testimonies that are admissible in court.
The Congress accepted Smithson's bequeathed and pledged to the United States for a charitable trust. After many years of debates, an Act of Congress that was signed by President Polk, stating that Smithson's money will be used to establish the Smithsonian Institution. Since its founding until the recent, Smithsonian Institution became one of the world's largest museum.
Answer: A. More positive
Explanation: Brendan did not like psychology classes because of his conflicting and contradictory views on the subject. According to the theory of cognitive dissonance, when there is a lack of harmony regarding different, conflicting opinions, ideas and beliefs about a phenomenon or event, then one must find the consistency of those opinion, ideas and beliefs. By achieving consistency of opinion and beliefs, a view of a particular phenomenon or event changes and becomes more positive.
Answer:
Autonomic nervous system
Explanation:
The autonomic nervous system is the part of the nervous system that is responsible for involuntary actions in our bodies. Involuntary actions or functions are those functions in our bodies that are performed without our being conscious about it. For example, heartbeat, flowing of blood, digestion, etc.
<u>In the given case, when Stacey experienced fight-or-flight her sympathetic branch was activated due to the autonomic nervous system as her heartbeat started pumping faster and her blood pressure surged</u>.
Answer:
Empathy for them, because they intend to gain something
Explanation:
Research has found an answer to the question of whether people will help out-group and in-group members. People help their in-group members because of the feeling of empathy for them and out-group members because of what they stand to gain.
Individuals in a group feel more closely knitted together and hence feel more affected by the disadvantage of any of their member, thus they are more likely to help that member because of the feelings of empathy towards him, a hurt to one is a hurt to all. On the contrary, when people help individuals they are not in the same group with, they do so with the hope of getting something in return, maybe financial benefits or any other type of benefit.
