The Answer Is In Fact "Liquefaction".
Hope I Helped :)
Nmskkkqkokswkkijnw!!!! Yes
Answer:
c. 25 percent.
Explanation:
The computation of the reserve requirement percentage is shown below:
Given that
Deposits made = $8,000
Loans = $6,000
So the required reserve is
= deposits made - loans
= $8,000 - $6,000
= $2,000
Now the required reserve is
= $2,000 ÷ $8,000
= 25%
Hence, the correct option is c. 25 percent
We simply applied the above formula so that the correct value could come
And, the same is to be considered
Answer:
10.12%
Explanation:
Wacc = (D / V)rd (1 - t) + (E / V) re
(D/V) = 0.3
Rd = before tax cost of debt = 5.5%
T = tax rate = 30%
(E / V) = 0.7
Re = marginal cost of equity = 12.8%
= (0.3 x 5.5% × 0.7) + (0.7 x 12.8%) = 1.155% + 8.96% = 10.12%
I hope my answer helps you
Answer:
First we need to first find the equilibrium quantity and price during normal times.
The equilibrium price in normal times is P=$3 and the equilibrium quantity is 55 bottles.
During the hurricane, the government will set a price ceiling of $3. We can infer from the table that the quantity supplied at P=$3 is 55 bottles while the quantity demanded during hurricane at the price of $3 per bottle is 105 bottles. Hence,
105-55= 50
During a hurricane, there would be a shortage of 50 bottles of water.
If there were no price ceiling, then the equilibrium price would be such that the quantity demanded during hurricane equals the quantity supplied. From the table we can see that the equilibrium price would in that case be P=$5 per bottle where the equilibrium quantity is 85 bottles. With the price ceiling only 55 bottles are available for trading. Now without the price ceiling 85 bottles are available.
Hence consumers would have to pay an additional $2 (=5-3) but they can now buy an additional 30 bottles [=85-55].
Without the antiprice gouging law, consumers would have to pay $2 more than the ceiling price, but they would bv able to buy 30 more bottles of water.
