Answer:
<h2>store water </h2><h2>control flooding </h2><h2>water crops </h2>
Explanation:
Well, from looking at the chart, it seems that there's a huge loss of life on the "winning" side. I believe the people of those countries must've felt emotionally and economically defeated. Considering the great amount of lives lost during the war, I'd say it would effect the society emotionally and there'd be fewer people around. And during wars countries usually use lots of money and weaponry to fund the cause, so those nations must've been in a huge economic crisis once the war ended. <span />
Answer:
The main advantages of the USA were:
A larger population, the USA had the majority of large cities of North America at the time, and a lot of immigrants, while the Confederacy was mainly rural, and not as populated. This larger population meant a more numerous army.
And a more powerful economy with some industry, which facilitated the production of arms and supplies for the military.
The disadvantage was that USA was the aggressor, and had to take up territory, while the confederacy only had to defend itself.
The confederacy main advantage was that as defenders, they knew most of the territory better, and had overall a more advantageous geographical position, at least at the start of the war. The main disadvantage for the Confederacy was precisely the smaller population -which means a smaller army- and the less developed economy, which was mainly agrarian, lacking almost any form of industry.
Answer:
Whites in the North feared competition for their jobs.
Answer:
The lines are blurred more thoroughly in the music of Franz Liszt, possibly the best-known composer of program music, whose specifically programmatic works—such as the Faust Symphony and some of his symphonic poems—are not often performed.
Explanation:
i hope this helped, can i get brainliest plz?
