I believe your answer is A) they were passed to punish the city of Philadelphia
Reason being, after the Boston Tea Party the king was very upset and didn't approve of what his subjects did. Especially when they blamed it on the Indians. So to show them who was boss, the king gave them extra taxes, and also closed off their ports from other business
Answer:
A some throwbacks for a direct democracy is explained below in details.
Explanation:
In a direct democracy, characters choose management without any mediator. Depending on the appropriate system in practice, direct democracy might necessitate transient executive resolutions, the application of sortition, composing laws, straight selecting or removing executives, and conducting hearings.
Answer:
* Offering imperative public types of assistance is regularly observed as the duty of the state. In any case, Non state institutions are probably going to convey water, disinfection, schooling and well being in most non-industrial nation settings.
* Non state institutions take numerous structures, going from enormous scope revenue driven firms, to singular business people, to non-benefit local gatherings. In clash influenced settings, some essential administrations may likewise be conveyed by non-state furnished gatherings with regional command over a specific region.
* In different settings, NGOs or religious associations might be the provider of decision for a few or all pieces of the populace.
* Exploration shows that needy individuals use Non state institutions to an astonishing degree, given the related expenses, and now and again pick them over free open administrations.
Explanation:
Non state institutions take on different structures: NGOs, both public and worldwide; native and minority gatherings; semi-self-sufficient gatherings; basic liberties safeguards; fear mongers; paramilitary gatherings; self-governing zones; internationalized domains; global endeavors; and, at long last, people.
A significant number of these gatherings advance common freedoms while others, actually, overlook violations or even carry out wrongdoings influencing the lives and basic liberties of people.
Answer:
that his First Amendment rights were being violated
Explanation:
Gitlow v. New York was a case that was ruled by the Supreme Court of the United States on June 8, 1925 and stated that the First Amendment of the United States Constitution "Protection of Free Speech" also applied to state governments also. According to Gitlow, his article did not precipitate any violent action, but he was yet convicted, which he felt was a violation of his rights to freedom of speech as stated in the First Amendment.
