Whenever a research is done, you must reject or accept a null hypothesis (the one you consider is not correct) or your work hypothesis (the theory you think is must probably accurate or close to the truth) usually, when performing a research, you will not always obtain positive or statistically significant results, that validate your hypothesis. Is actually, not unusual that extremes (or extraordinary results) come out (unexpected for several reasons: incorrect size of the sample, improper selection of the subjects- a bias- lack of correct determination of the variable measured or failure to determine the type of the variable-numerical, categorical, ratio,etc-)
Positive or negative results are yet, results whether they prove or reject your hypothesis. Failing to establish a scientific hypothesis does not necessarily mean that they did something wrong, it just says that the hypothesis tested does not approach correctly to the epistemological truth (ultimately, any research is only a mere approximation to reality). Therefore, when two scientists deny sharing<em> unusual results</em>, they are acting unethically, hiding results that can mean something from a different point of view.
reference
Nicholson, R. S. (1989). On being a scientist. Science, 246(4928), 305-306.
In the 19th and early 20th centuries, one room schoolhouses were the norm in rural areas. A single teacher taught grades one through eight<span> together. The youngest students—called Abecedarians, because they would learn their </span>ABCs<span>—sat in the front, while the oldest sat in the back. The room was heated by a single wood stove.</span>
Answer:
negative correlation
Explanation:
is show between education and fertility where educated woman tend to focus more on school and worry themselves in climbing a career ladder than woman that is more fertile and stay at home with no education or career to look forward too.In most cases they spend so much time making babies because they free time of doing nothing.
Answer:
both cooperative learning and problem-centered instruction
Explanation:
The collaborative learning method refers to the process of learning in which the group of students involves a particular problem to solve it or to accomplish any specific task. It is believed that learning is a process involving continuous involvement and is considered a social act altogether. In the given case, Mr. WIllis has used both cooperative learning and problem-centered instruction. By separating the students and then collaborating to a conclusion, he used the method of cooperative learning. At the same time, he gave the instruction centered on the problem.
