Answer:
A decrease in the elasticity of demand for the cartel's product.
Explanation:
The cartel is under the control of companies operating in the same area. This is undesirable. It is concluded between businesses and these contracts prevent competition. Such arrangements are also prevented by governments, which aims to promote competition among governments across the country. This type of arrangement creates unity and demonstrates business behavior in activities that prevent other competitors from entering the sector.
Adverse effects on consumers include:
1) Higher prices - cartel members can raise prices, which reduces the demand elasticity of any member.
2) Lack of Transparency - Members may agree to hide prices or hide information such as hidden charges in credit card transactions.
3) Limited production - Members may agree to limit market production, such as OPEC and oil quotas.
4) Build Market - Cartel members can collectively divide a market into regions or regions and not compete in each other's territory.
Answer:
rework hope this helps :)
Explanation:
Answer:
3400, Rise, C
Explanation:
1. Since there are just 3 firms and two already has a sum total of 70% (40+30), the third firm will have a market share of 30%
HHI= 
HHI= 1600+900+900
HHI= 3400
2. Abe's Bikes with 30% leaves the market, if the two firms were to share Abe's market share equally (15+15), it will leave Firm A with 55% (40+15) and Firm B with (30+15) 45%
Therefore,
HHI= 
HHI=3025+2025
HHI= 5050
A rise in HHI
3. C
An index of 10,000 corresponds to a monopoly firm with 100% market share.
Answer:
The payback period for Silva Inc. is 3 years. If considering only this method of evaluating projects, Silva Inc will invest in project A and dismiss project B.
Payback period A=2,1539 years.
Payback period B= 3,0042 years
Explanation:
The payback period refers to the amount of time it takes to recover the cost of an investment. The payback period is the length of time an investment reaches a breakeven point.
<u>Cash Flow A:</u>
$
I0= - 70.000
1= 28000 = -42000
2= 38000 = -4000
3= 26000 = 22000
Payback period= full years until recovery +
unrecovered cost beginning year/Cashflow during year
Payback period A= 2 + (4000/26000)= 2,1539 years.
<u>Cash Flow B:</u>
$
I0= -80000
1= 20000 = -60000
2= 23000 = -37000
3= 36000 = -1000
4= 240000 = 239000
Payback period B= 3 + 1000/240000= 3,0042 years
<u>The payback period for Silva Inc. is 3 years. If considering only this method of evaluating projects, Silva Inc will invest in project A and dismiss project B. </u>
<u></u>
