Answer:
liable
Explanation:
The word "exempt" means free from an obligation or <u>liability</u>. Notice I underlined liability. I did this because exempt is free from liability. Thus, the opposite or antonym of exempt is liable
Pretty sure its a simile. It cant be personification because it says “he” which refers to a living and breathing human. I don’t think it would be a hyperbole because hyperboles are an over exaggerated description. It doesn’t use like or as, so i would say in this case simile.
The italicized noun clause is used as B. direct object in this sentence.
It is relatively easy to spot a direct object in a sentence - just ask the question what/whom? So - What did I find? - What I was looking for.
There is no subject complement here, and the subject is the pronoun I.
Answer:
My friend Joe, who has a cast on his leg, is going to the arcade with me today.
Explanation:
it’s like a side note. Usually where you would speak differently if you know what I mean
The correct pronoun would be, Each king must have his castle;
Because the first one, Each king must have it's castle, does not make sense because of the It's, a king is a male person so it should be his.
It's not the third one because, Each king must have his or her castle, doesn't make sense because a king is a male not a female so her would not be used to <span>define a man.
The fourth one would be incorrect too because, Each king must have their castle, makes no sense either because their is for more than one person and in this case we are just talking about kings no one else
Hope this helped! :) </span>