Answer:
The value is 
The correct option is a
Step-by-step explanation:
From the question we are told that
The margin of error is E = 0.05
From the question we are told the confidence level is 95% , hence the level of significance is
=> 
Generally from the normal distribution table the critical value of is
Generally since the sample proportion is not given we will assume it to be
Generally the sample size is mathematically represented as
![n = [\frac{Z_{\frac{\alpha }{2} }}{E} ]^2 * \^ p (1 - \^ p )](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=n%20%3D%20%5B%5Cfrac%7BZ_%7B%5Cfrac%7B%5Calpha%20%7D%7B2%7D%20%7D%7D%7BE%7D%20%5D%5E2%20%2A%20%5C%5E%20p%20%281%20-%20%5C%5E%20p%20%29%20)
=> ![n = [\frac{ 1.96 }{0.05} ]^2 *0.5 (1 - 0.5)](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=n%20%3D%20%5B%5Cfrac%7B%201.96%20%7D%7B0.05%7D%20%5D%5E2%20%2A0.5%20%281%20-%200.5%29%20)
=>
Generally the margin of error is mathematically represented as
Generally if the level of confidence increases, the critical value of 
increase and from the equation for margin of error we see the the critical value varies directly with the margin of error , hence the margin of error will increase also
So If the confidence level is increased, then the sample size would need to increase because a higher level of confidence increases the margin of error.
Answer:
y=45
x=9
z= 9 root 2
Step-by-step explanation:
This is a right isosceles triangle, so
y=45
x=9
z= 9 root 2
9²+9²=z²
81+81=z²
162=z²
√162=z
z=9√2
So, this question is basically asking us "If we had an x instead of a 2, would this be true?" We can try and see what we get:
So, if we want to show this we have to change the numerator or denominator in such a way that we can cancel some common factors. Notice that 
If we replace the factored numerator with the original one, we get:
Since we have an equality, this relation is proved.
Answer:
6 stand for 600(six hundred).
Put each number where Y should be (so 24/3 or 39/3) then simplify. If it is less than or equal to 12 than it satisfies the equation. A. Yes B. No C. Yes and D. Yes
