1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
alukav5142 [94]
3 years ago
12

The conversation between the woman and the boy shows that

Social Studies
1 answer:
Tatiana [17]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Willing to listen dont know what there saying butyah

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Borderline personality disorder, in which some behavior "borders" on being out of touch with reality, was first associated with
pochemuha
The answer is:  " <span>Otto Kernberg " .
______________________________________________________
     "</span><span>Borderline personality disorder, in which some behavior "borders"
on being out of touch with reality, was first associated with the ideas of </span>
<u> Otto Kernberg </u>."  
______________________________________________________
7 0
3 years ago
WHAT HAPPENED TO THE UNEMPLOYMENT RATE AFTER THE STOCK MARKRT CRASH IN 1929
baherus [9]
It went up. A lot. So say it increased significantly.
3 0
3 years ago
In what way did the Mongol empire affect Russia and Persia similarly?
Paraphin [41]
D)the mongols established a central code of laws and policies
4 0
3 years ago
A researcher stands on a street corner and surveys people who pass by about their opinion on contraception. because the research
anygoal [31]
That statement is False.
If the researcher is  using random sampling, All subjects that chosen for the study had equal responsibility of being chosen
When the researcher determines that the amount of female and male subjects, must be the same,  the research no longer has the equal opportunity for all the test subjects to be chosen.
 
7 0
3 years ago
Briefly summarize the facts of the Dred Scott case and discuss the impact that the decision had on the growing conflict between
Viktor [21]

Answer:

"In April 1846, Dred and Harriet filed separate lawsuits for freedom in the St. Louis Circuit Court against Irene Emerson based on two Missouri statutes. One statute allowed any person of any color to sue for wrongful enslavement. The other stated that any person taken to a free territory automatically became free and could not be re-enslaved upon returning to a slave state.

Neither Dred nor Harriet Scott could read or write, and needed both logistical and financial support to plead their case. They received it from their church, abolitionists and an unlikely source, the Blow family who had once owned them.  

Since Dred and Harriet Scott had lived in Illinois and the Wisconsin Territory — both free domains — they hoped they had a persuasive case. When they went to trial on June 30, 1847, however, the court ruled against them on a technicality and the judge granted a retrial.

The Scott’s went to trial again in January 1850 and won their freedom. Irene appealed the case to the Missouri Supreme Court which combined Dred and Harriet’s cases and reversed the lower court’s decision in 1852, making Dred Scott and his family slaves again.  

In November 1853, Scott filed a federal lawsuit with the United States Circuit Court for the District of Missouri. By this time, Irene had transferred Scott and his family to her brother, John Sanford (although it was determined later that she retained ownership). On May 15, 1854, the federal court heard Dred Scott v. Sanford and ruled against Scott, holding him and his family in slavery.  

In December 1854, Scott appealed his case to the United States Supreme Court. The trial began on February 11, 1856. By this time, the case had gained notoriety and Scott received support from many abolitionists, including powerful politicians and high-profile attorneys. But on March 6, 1857, in the infamous Dred Scott decision, Scott lost his fight for freedom again...... By the time the U.S. Supreme Court handed down its Dred Scott decision, Irene had married her second husband, Calvin Chaffee, a U.S. congressman and abolitionist. Upset upon learning his wife still owned the most infamous slave of the time, he sold Scott and his family to Taylor Blow, the son of Peter Blow, Scott’s original owner.  

Taylor freed Scott and his family on May 26, 1857. Scott found work as a porter in a St. Louis hotel, but didn’t live long as a free man. At about 59 years of age, Scott died from tuberculosis on September 17, 1858."

Explanation:

Source: https://www.history.com/topics/black-history/dred-scott-case

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was the importance of D-day?
    8·1 answer
  • What is a main problem with determining the social benefits of a public good like a community fireworks show?
    9·2 answers
  • What was Jesus born to be
    10·2 answers
  • What was the stronger force at the Homestead Steel Mill in 1892- the differences or the commonalities between unskilled and skil
    6·2 answers
  • some perceptions result from assumptions we make about the environment that we are not even aware of. this theory of unconscious
    7·1 answer
  • Question 10
    8·1 answer
  • WILL GIVE BRAINLEIST IF YOU ANSWER RIGHT PLEASE USE A B C D
    8·2 answers
  • A reason that countries trade with each other is
    5·2 answers
  • Queen hatshehesut taxes
    7·1 answer
  • What made the Missouri Compromise unconstitutional?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!