<span>Romantic and Victorian</span>
Answer:
<em>Since there are no options, I'll answer the question according to my understanding.</em>
The concept of triadic closure suggests that if a strong tie would exist between Michelle and Brenda, as well as Michelle and J.ulie, then a strong tie would also exist between Brenda and J.ulie.
Explanation:
The "triadic closure" is a theory that was proposed by <em>Georg Simmel </em>regarding <em>"social networking.</em>" This shows the relationships among people and how their relationships evolve over time.
In the situation above, Michelle brings Brenda and J.ulie together which means Michelle is acting as the local bridge. So, this is the reason why Brenda and J.ulie stay friends. This concept is true, provided that both Brenda and J.ulie desire to be friends with each other. If not, then they are not satisfying the triadic closure property.
Answer:
Promissory estoppel
Explanation:
If an oral contract has been declared unenforceable under the statute of frauds, yet one of the parties has rendered some performance under the contract that conferred benefits on the other party, he or she can recover the reasonable value of the performance in <u>promissory estoppel</u>.
The statute of fraud requires that contracts exceeding $500 in value, or involves the sale of landed property or extending a period of a year or more in length must be in writing and not oral. However, in a situation whereby a party has rendered some performance in the contract that confers benefits on the other party, the other party is obligated to also perform his/her part of the contract under the doctrine of promissory estoppel. The doctrine of promissory estoppel insist that an individual or party to a contract must perform his/her obligation or promise, even though there is not written proof of a contract as far as the other party has rendered some form of performance.
