Answer: d. provide disclosure in the footnotes to the financial statements.
Explanation:
A contingent liability is an obligation that a company might owe in future depending on the outcome of an event such as a law suit.
To record a contingent liability in the books, two conditions must be satisfied;
- Loss must be probable
- Amount must be estimable
If these two conditions are not satisfied then the contingent liability may simply be disclosed as a footnote in the financial statement. The amount here is not estimable so can be disclosed as a footnote.
Answer:
The answer is B.
Explanation:
Unemployed people are those who are out of work and who are actively looking for a job. They are also those citizens they are willing to work but cannot find.
The unemployment rate is 6 percent.
So, The number of unemployed workers in this economy is 9 million (6 percent of 150 million civilian labour force)
We cannot use the total population because out of it, we have young citizen and old ones who are not searching for or willing to work.
Answer:
Many large corporations want to become more like small businesses because they want to make their firm more flexible, resourceful, innovative, and competitive. ... For businesses based off the internet, they are able to adapt to market changes quickly.
Yes I would sacrifice potentially winning the state title. Using performance enhancing drugs is both morally wrong, and illegal. If my team was to win states I would want it to be because we deserved it, not because players were taking drugs. Not only that, but the players who took the drugs could be causing a lot of harm to their bodies, something that isn't worth a title.
Bistro's first banner was a form of a unilateral contract. This means that the banner was a legally enforceable promise between two parties where one party will perform the requirement and the other (Bistro) would pay.
For the given situation, Daisy substantially performed the required task and therefore, Bistro is not allowed to revoke the offer.
Based on the above, the statement that <span>best describes Daisy's and Bistro's rights in this situation is:
</span><span>Bistro cannot revoke the offer because Daisy has substantially performed the requested action.</span>
