What is the radius of that equation?

Deshawn invests $5,000 in a savings account that earns 6% annual interest, compounded continuously. How long will it take to dou

koban [17]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Investment = $5,000

Annual Interest = 5%

5000/100 x 5/1

50×5 = 250

First year interest = $250

Therefore, 250 x 20

= $5,000

It will take him 40 years.

6 0

3 years ago

Here ya go heres those last questions :)

skelet666 [1.2K]

The 3 bubble is the correct answer.

being that you're looking for 3.60 in quarters(25) and nickles (5) which add up to be 3.60 so 25q+5n=360

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which of these is a geometric experiment? A. Drawing 1 card from each of 5 different decks of cards and getting 2 clubs B. Flipp

Mrac [35]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

ROLLING A DIE AND GETTING YOUR FIRST FOUR ON THE 6TH ROLL

4 0

3 years ago

Many companies use well-known celebrities as spokespersons in their TV advertisements. A study was conducted to determine whethe

s2008m [1.1K]

Answer:

There is enough evidence to support the claim that the proportion of brand awareness of female TV viewers and the gender of the spokesperson are not independent (P-value = 0.01537).

Step-by-step explanation:

<em>The question is incomplete: the picture attached gives the missing sample data.</em>

This is a hypothesis test for the difference between proportions.

The claim that is going to be stated in the alternative hypothesis is that the proportion of brand awareness of female TV viewers and the gender of the spokesperson are not independent. This means that the proportions differ significantly.

Then, the null and alternative hypothesis can be written as:

$H_0: \pi_1-\pi_2=0\\\\H_a:\pi_1-\pi_2\neq 0$

The significance level is 0.05.

The sample 1 (Male celebrity), of size n1=150 has a proportion of p1=0.273.

$p_1=X_1/n_1=41/150=0.273$

The sample 2 (Female celebrity), of size n2=150 has a proportion of p2=0.407.

$p_2=X_2/n_2=61/150=0.407$

The difference between proportions is (p1-p2)=-0.133.

$p_d=p_1-p_2=0.273-0.407=-0.133$

The pooled proportion, needed to calculate the standard error, is:

$p=\dfrac{X_1+X_2}{n_1+n_2}=\dfrac{41+61.05}{150+150}=\dfrac{102}{300}=0.34$

The estimated standard error of the difference between means is computed using the formula:

$s_{p1-p2}=\sqrt{\dfrac{p(1-p)}{n_1}+\dfrac{p(1-p)}{n_2}}=\sqrt{\dfrac{0.34*0.66}{150}+\dfrac{0.34*0.66}{150}}\\\\\\s_{p1-p2}=\sqrt{0.001496+0.001496}=\sqrt{0.002992}=0.055$

Then, we can calculate the z-statistic as:

$z=\dfrac{p_d-(\pi_1-\pi_2)}{s_{p1-p2}}=\dfrac{-0.133-0}{0.055}=\dfrac{-0.133}{0.055}=-2.44$

This test is a two-tailed test, so the P-value for this test is calculated as (using a z-table):

$P-value=2\cdot P(z$

As the P-value (0.01537) is smaller than the significance level (0.05), the effect is significant.

The null hypothesis is rejected.

There is enough evidence to support the claim that the proportion of brand awareness of female TV viewers and the gender of the spokesperson are not independent (the proportions differ).