Answer:
contact hypothesis
Explanation:
The answer is --
"contact hypothesis".
Contact hypothesis in psychological terms when people of different race or beliefs interact under a certain appropriate conditions and they communicate and interact with each other, it helps in reducing the preconceived ideas or preconception among the members of the majority group and the minority group.
Thus the interracial communication among people of equal status decreases the prejudice and the stereotypes of the people in cooperative circumstances according to the contact hypothesis.
Hence the answer is --
contact hypothesis
This is false. For the chemist, it would be not be logical to ascribe morality to the drug itself.
<h3>What is morality?</h3>
This is the term that is used to refer to all of the ways that has to do with the ways that people are to act in the right way for the common good of all persons. It has to do with acting in ethical ways and showing all acts of social responsibility.
Hence we can say that this is false. For the chemist, it would be not be logical to ascribe morality to the drug itself.
Read more morality here: brainly.com/question/1326871
#SPJ1
1. We can analyze the possible social benefits or consequences by creating a standard that deemed as 'desirable' social situation and measures the situation before and after the militarization.
If after the militarization our society got closer to the desirable outcome, we would say that the militarization produces a social benefit.
2. We could take a look at the example of American military occupation in Iraq.
Initially, we intended for the militarization to create a democratic country in iraq after we remove the dictator from power.
But it only resulted in a vacuum that attract many radical groups to came in to control the country. In this case, we can conclude that the militarization produce more consequences than benefit.
Answer:
The Nullification Crisis of 1932 happened because the Southern was against the protective tariffs introduced to tax all foreign goods by the Northern states. South was basically agricultural and dependent on manufactured products from the North and other countries, so these tariffs were considered bad for their economy. The Southern states decided to cancel the tariffs and form their own Confederate States of America which was opposed to the United States. This event was the principal responsible for the civil war.
Explanation:
If<span> neither candidate gets a majority of the 538 </span>electoral<span> votes, the </span>election<span> for President is decided in the House of Representatives, with each state delegation having one vote. A majority of states (26) is needed to win. Hope this answers the question. Have a nice day.</span>