1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
gulaghasi [49]
2 years ago
11

Jamie experiments to compare the masses and volumes of different types of toy balls. She places 10 different types of balls in a

large bucket of tap water. Out of the 10 balls, six of them float and four sink. Richard wants to replicate her experiment. He also puts 10 toy balls in a large bucket of tap water. Eight of them float. Which of the following gives the most likely reason for the difference between Jamie’s and Richard’s results?
Richard used more water.


Richard used different brands of toy balls.


Richard used a bucket with a different shape.


Richard placed the objects in the water more slowly.
Social Studies
1 answer:
GREYUIT [131]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Richard used different brands of toy balls.

Explanation:

i hope this helped!

You might be interested in
The ______ hypothesis suggests that in cooperative circumstances interracial interaction between individuals of equal status may
maks197457 [2]

Answer:

contact hypothesis                

Explanation:

The answer is --

"contact hypothesis".

            Contact hypothesis in psychological terms when people of different race or beliefs interact under a certain appropriate conditions and they communicate and interact with each other, it helps in reducing the preconceived ideas or preconception among the members of the majority group and the minority group.

           Thus the interracial communication among people of equal status decreases the prejudice and the stereotypes of the people in cooperative circumstances according to the contact hypothesis.

Hence the answer is --

contact hypothesis  

8 0
3 years ago
True or false: for a chemist, it would seem logical to ascribe morality to the drug itself.
drek231 [11]

This is false. For the chemist, it would be not be logical to ascribe morality to the drug itself.

<h3>What is morality?</h3>

This is the term that is used to refer to all of the ways that has to do with the ways that people are to act in the right way for the common good of all persons. It has to do with acting in ethical ways and showing all acts of social responsibility.

Hence we can say that this is false. For the chemist, it would be not be logical to ascribe morality to the drug itself.

Read more morality here:  brainly.com/question/1326871

#SPJ1

8 0
1 year ago
How can we analyze the possible social benefits or consequences to society by the militarization of the police using our sociolo
dimaraw [331]
1. We can analyze the possible social benefits or consequences by creating a standard that deemed as 'desirable' social situation and measures the situation before and after the militarization.
If after the militarization our society got closer to the desirable outcome, we would say that the militarization produces a social benefit.

2. We could take a look at the example of American military occupation in Iraq.
Initially, we intended for the militarization to create a democratic country in iraq after we remove the dictator from power.
But it only resulted in a vacuum that attract many radical groups to came in to control the country. In this case, we can conclude that the militarization produce more consequences than benefit.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which best identifies the key events of the nullification crisis?
zlopas [31]

Answer:

The Nullification Crisis of 1932 happened because the Southern was against the protective tariffs introduced to tax all foreign goods by the Northern states. South was basically agricultural and dependent on manufactured products from the North and other countries, so these tariffs were considered bad for their economy. The Southern states decided to cancel the tariffs and form their own Confederate States of America which was opposed to the United States. This event was the principal responsible for the civil war.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Given recent yearsÍ results and current voting trends; create a scenario in which the Electoral
scoray [572]
If<span> neither candidate gets a majority of the 538 </span>electoral<span> votes, the </span>election<span> for President is decided in the House of Representatives, with each state delegation having one vote. A majority of states (26) is needed to win. Hope this answers the question. Have a nice day.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which part of a mountain receives the majority of moisture due to the rain shadow effect?
    13·2 answers
  • Rank the 4 regions of Texas from lowest to highest elevation.
    5·1 answer
  • Can someone help me
    10·1 answer
  • Select all that apply!!!! select all that apply!!! thanks, From 1000-1500 A.D., how did cities like Cairo change? 100 points!!!!
    9·2 answers
  • Four causes of family conflict​
    13·2 answers
  • What was the purpose of the Albany Plan?
    5·1 answer
  • The Silk Road
    10·2 answers
  • Does any one know her/him<br> they keep on deleting my answers
    12·2 answers
  • What prompted the British to try to retake Georgia?
    10·1 answer
  • Private information about the distribution of military power between two sides can lead to war by making leaders overestimate th
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!