Answer:
a) 46.98%
b) increasing rate of change
Step-by-step explanation:
In year 1987, investment worth $29800
In year 1997, investment worth $43800
Rate of change = 1997investment - 1987investment / 1987investment × 100
Rate of change = 43800 - 29800/29800 × 100
= 14000/29800 × 100
= 0.46979 × 100
= 46.98%
Therefore, the rate of change of the investment during the time period is 46.98%.
b) The rate of change of the investment is increasing. This is as a result of the following reasons. First, the value of rate of change is positive. Second, there is no value for rate of change for period before the time period so we cannot compare rate of change.
Answer:
when x = 3, x would equal 3 since x can be substituted as 3, aka chancge any xes into 3 if they give you yhat info
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Type I error.
Step-by-step explanation:
The decision to shut the process is triggered by the conclusion that the average height is significantly different from 66 mm.
This means that the null hypothesis, that states that the average height is not significantly different from 66 mm (μ=66), has been rejected.
If the null hypothesis is rejected, the error that can have been made is to reject a true null hypothesis, when the process is functioning to specification and the average length is not significantly different from 66.
This is a Type I error, that happens when a true null hypothesis is rejected.
The second result is more precise because it's in millilitre,so if the first were to be fully precise,it should have been 78.6 cm.
Hope this helps!