yes! what do you need?
Step-by-step explanation:
THREE MILES M88888888888888888888888888888888 also your profile pic is natsu
Answer:
Following are the solution to this question:
Step-by-step explanation:
For this set, the correlation coefficient is = -0.015.
It shows that financial variables have trust issues. Once a price rises, the other one is decreasing the value of -0,015 shows, that there are several fewer associations in the set of data among x and y and between y values. This interaction also can range between -1 to 1, to 0 being completely unrelated. But you'd never be sure, in this situation, 0.015 is very similar to 0.
It means that your prediction is nothing better than just a wild choice. Its odds of an estimated value being relatively close to the actual result are therefore much smaller as the points are it's hardly the best match.
Step-by-step explanation:
Since it remains only 1 sweet, we can subtract it from the total and get the amount of sweets distributed (=1024).
As all the sweets are distributed equally, we must divide the number of distributed sweets by all its dividers (excluding 1024 and 1, we'll see later why):
1) 512 => 2 partecipants
2) 256 => 4 partecipants
3) 128 => 8 partecipants
4) 64 => 16 partecipants
5) 32 => 32 partecipants
6) 16 => 64 partecipants
7) 8 => 128 partecipants
9) 4 => 256 partecipants
10) 2 => 512 partecipants
The number on the left represents the number of sweets given to the partecipants, and on the right we have the number of the partecipants. Note that all the numbers on the left are dividers of 1024.
Why excluding 1 and 1024? Because the problem tells us that there remains 1 sweet. If there was 1 sweet for every partecipant, the number of partecipants would be 1025, but that's not possible as there remains 1 sweet. If it was 1024, it wouldn't work as well because the sweets are 1025 and if 1 is not distributed it goes again against the problem that says all sweets are equally distributed.
Answer:
he is dabbing
Step-by-step explanation:
