Help me with this question please
2 answers:
You might be interested in
Answer:
The most correct option is;
(B) 958.2 ft.²
Step-by-step explanation:
From the question, the dimension of each square = 3 ft.²
Therefore, the length of the sides of the square = √3 ft.
Based on the above dimensions, the dimension of the small semicircle is found by counting the number of square sides ti subtends as follows;
The dimension of the diameter of the small semicircle = 10·√3
Radius of the small semicircle = Diameter/2 = 10·√3/2 = 5·√3
Area of the small semicircle = (π·r²)/2 = (π×(5·√3)²)/2 = 117.81 ft.²
Similarly;
The dimension of the diameter of the large semicircle = 10·√3 + 2 × 6 × √3
∴ The dimension of the diameter of the large semicircle = 22·√3
Radius of the large semicircle = Diameter/2 = 22·√3/2 = 11·√3
Area of the large semicircle = (π·r²)/2 = (π×(11·√3)²)/2 = 570.2 ft.²
Area of rectangle = 11·√3 × 17·√3 = 561
Area, A of large semicircle cutting into the rectangle is found as follows;
Where:
Hence;
Therefore; t
The area covered by the pavers = 561 - 128.3 + 570.2 - 117.81 = 885.19 ft²
Therefor, the most correct option is (B) 958.2 ft.².
Consider the missing lines of question are "Due to the Enhanced Community Quarantine, Grand Royal Spa temporarily stopped its operation and to help the employees, the owner decided to split evenly its total revenue of 65,000.00".
Given:
Total revenue = 65000
Number of employees = x
To find:
The function which represents the amount each received.
Solution:
We know that,
Substitute the given values in the above formula.
So, the function which represents the amount each received is
Therefore, the required function is .
Note: Given options are not correct and option C is incomplete.
Answer:
Yes. At this significance level, there is evidence to support the claim that there is a difference in the ability of the brands to absorb water.
Step-by-step explanation:
<em>The question is incomplete:</em>
<em>The significance level is 0.05.</em>
<em>The data is:</em>
<em>Brand X: 91, 100, 88, 89</em>
<em>Brand Y: 99, 96, 94, 99</em>
<em>Brand Z: 83, 88, 89, 76</em>
We have to check if there is a significant difference between the absorbency rating of each brand.
Null hypothesis: all means are equal
Alternative hypothesis: the means are not equal
We have to apply a one-way ANOVA
We start by calculating the standard deviation for each brand:
Then, we calculate the mean standard error (MSE):
Now, we calculate the mean square between (MSB), but we previously have to know the sample means and the mean of the sample means:
The MSB is then:
Now we calculate the F statistic as:
The degrees of freedom of the numerator are:
The degrees of freedom of the denominator are:
The P-value of F=7.23, dfn=2 and dfd=9 is:
As the P-value (0.013) is smaller than the significance level (0.05), the null hypothesis is rejected.
There is evidence to support the claim that there is a difference in the ability of the brands to absorb water.