Answer:
moral dillema
Example:
having to choose between saving a dog from a fire or saving your sister
The correct answer is C) 1941. Hope this helps.
Answer:
C). Inadmissible, because the report is hearsay not within any exception.
Explanation:
As per the given details, the court must find the report 'inadmissible, and the key reason is that the report is hearsay which does not come under any exception.' <u>The court is permitted to accept a report of witness' statement only if the statement is made under oath or witness himself/herself confirms the statement in the court and the court is satisfied that the statement is reliable</u>. The other options are incorrect as they either misrepresent the way in which statement was acquired(option D) or due to inappropriately taken(without oath) i.e. stated in option A. While option B is false as the public records cannot be considered as business records and thereby, not reliable. Thus, <u>option C</u> is the correct answer.
Answer:
C) Shanika pays $35.88 more than Vanessa.
Explanation:
This is because when doing the math, which is very simple, you can notice that, even though Shanika and Vanessa are using almost the same amount of energy during the 30 day period, <u>the plan that Vanessa is using gives her an advantage regarding the on-peak and off-peak hours</u>, which ultimately makes Shanika pay more than Vanessa.
