Answer:
This approach to (0,0) also gives the value 0
Step-by-step explanation:
Probably, you are trying to decide whether this limit exists or not. If you approach through the parabola y=x², you get
It does not matter if x>0 or x<0, the |x| on the denominator will cancel out with an x on the numerator, and you will get the term x²/(√(1+x²) which tends to 0.
If you want to prove that the limit doesn't exist, you have to approach through another curve and get a value different from zero.
However, in this case, the limit exists and its equal to zero. One way of doing this is to change to polar coordinates and doing a calculation similar to this one. Polar coordinates x=rcosФ, y=rsinФ work because the limit will only depend on r, no matter the approach curve.
Answer:
A. 24:56
Step-by-step explanation:
Let's find the answer by considering that 'X' represents the employees that earn the bonus and 'Y' the employees that didn't.
Where:
X=24
Y=56
Now, ''Express the number of employees who received the bonus as an unsimplified ratio to the number of employees who didn't receive the bonus'' means:
employees that earn the bonus : employees that didn't receive the bonus
which is:
X:Y = 24:56
In summary, the answer is A. 24:56.
Deletion: CATTCACG
insertion: CATTTCACACG
inversion: CATTGCACAC
duplication: CATTCACACCACG
substitution: CATTCACACA
21.2264 is 21.2 rounded to the nearest tenths; the place after the decimal is there tenths place so in the hundreths place, the number 2 is less than 5 therefore rounding it to 2.
If the question meant f(x)=2^(x) -3 then the answer should be 1 over 4 or 1/4
