Answer:
B=10
Explanation:
(-21) x 0=0 and (-50)÷(-5)=10
0+10=10
A useful advantage of Asymmetric encryption over symmetric
encryption is that there is no secret channel necessary for the
exchange of the public key, unlike in the symmetric encryption which requires a
secret channel to send the secret key.
Another
advantage of Asymmetric encryption is that is has increased security. Asymmetric
uses two different keys (Public and private) for both encryption and decryption
of data while symmetric uses one.
Answer:
23 ,21,10,63,13
Explanation:
We have to convert binary to decimal
10111 corresponding decimal number is
10101 corresponding decimal number is
01010 corresponding decimal number is
111111 corresponding decimal number is
001111 corresponding decimal number is
Answer:
1. b)
2. c)
3. c)
4. a)
5. b)
Explanation:
1. and 5. Linear kind of navigation is a system with a sequential manner web pages that are perfect for some sorts of sites that are having information that has to be viewed as a book (5) and when we are talking about that view we are considering one page after another page like we are reading a book. It is also the simplest navigation. This is the explanation for question 1 and question 5.
2. The most well-designed navigation system is an intuitive one because in this design of the website we have website traffic that is easy because it flows from one web page to another web page. It is showing us where to go to find and look for something and even where to go if there is no concrete options for what are we looking for.
3. A Sitemap is referring to the organized hierarchy of links and it is the protocol that is allowing us to search through many links. A Sitemap is having a listing of the URLs for some site and that is why this is the correct answer.
4. In using liner reciprocal navigation the interface should include how frames are left and how many of them are there. The more the frames, the more times the user will spend on them and the site.
A sixteen bit microprocessor chip used in early IBM PCs. The Intel 8088 was a version with an eight-bit externaldata bus.
The Intel 8086 was based on the design of the Intel 8080 <span>and </span>Intel 8085 (it was source compatible with the 8080)with a similar register set, but was expanded to 16 bits. The Bus Interface Unit fed the instruction stream to theExecution Unit through a 6 byte prefetch queue, so fetch and execution were concurrent - a primitive form ofpipelining (8086 instructions varied from 1 to 4 bytes).
It featured four 16-bit general registers, which could also be accessed as eight 8-bit registers, and four 16-bit indexregisters (including the stack pointer). The data registers were often used implicitly by instructions, complicatingregister allocation for temporary values. It featured 64K 8-bit I/O (or 32K 16 bit) ports and fixed vectored interrupts.There were also four segment registers that could be set from index registers.
The segment registers allowed the CPU to access 1 meg of memory in an odd way. Rather than just supplyingmissing bytes, as most segmented processors, the 8086 actually shifted the segment registers left 4 bits and addedit to the address. As a result, segments overlapped, and it was possible to have two pointers with the same valuepoint to two different memory locations, or two pointers with different values pointing to the same location. Mostpeople consider this a brain damaged design.
Although this was largely acceptable for assembly language, where control of the segments was complete (it couldeven be useful then), in higher level languages it caused constant confusion (e.g. near/far pointers). Even worse, thismade expanding the address space to more than 1 meg difficult. A later version, the Intel 80386, expanded thedesign to 32 bits, and "fixed" the segmentation, but required extra modes (suppressing the new features) forcompatibility, and retains the awkward architecture. In fact, with the right assembler, code written for the 8008 canstill be run on the most <span>recent </span>Intel 486.
The Intel 80386 added new op codes in a kludgy fashion similar to the Zilog Z80 and Zilog Z280. The Intel 486added full pipelines, and clock doubling (like <span>the </span>Zilog Z280).
So why did IBM chose the 8086 series when most of the alternatives were so much better? Apparently IBM's own engineers wanted to use the Motorola 68000, and it was used later in the forgotten IBM Instruments 9000 Laboratory Computer, but IBM already had rights to manufacture the 8086, in exchange for giving Intel the rights to its bubble memory<span> designs.</span> Apparently IBM was using 8086s in the IBM Displaywriter word processor.
Other factors were the 8-bit Intel 8088 version, which could use existing Intel 8085-type components, and allowed the computer to be based on a modified 8085 design. 68000 components were not widely available, though it could useMotorola 6800 components to an <span>extent.
</span>
Hope this helps
