No, because it has a constant rate of change
By looking at this table
The y value changes at a constant multiple of 2
6 4
7 2 (4-2 is a difference of 2)
8 0 (2-0 is a difference of 2)
9 -2 (0-2 is a difference of 2)
This means it is Linear
<span><span><span><span><span>I am so sorry if this is wrong, but
2−5</span>+4</span>+21</span>+1666666</span>−<span>(2)(43)
</span></span><span>=<span><span><span><span>−3+4</span>+21</span>+1666666</span>−<span>(2)(43)
</span></span></span><span>=<span><span>1+21+1666666</span>−<span>(2)(43)
</span></span></span><span>=<span>22+1666666−<span>(2)(43)
</span></span></span><span>=<span>1666688−<span>(2)(43)
</span></span></span><span>=1666688−86
</span><span>Your answer would be 1,666,602
Hope this helps!:)</span>
What’s The Question Again ?
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
A suitable table or calculator is needed.
One standard deviation from the mean includes 68.27% of the total, so the number of bottles in the range 20 ± 0.16 ounces will be ...
0.6827·26,000 = 17,750 . . . . . within 20 ± 0.16
__
The number below 1.5 standard deviations below the mean is about 6.68%, so for the given sample size is expected to be ...
0.66799·26,000 = 1737 . . . . . below 19.76
_____
<em>Comment on the first number</em>
The "empirical rule" tells you that 68% of the population is within 1 standard deviation (0.16 ounces) of the mean. When the number involved is expected to be expressed to 5 significant digits, your probability value needs better accuracy than that. To 6 digits, the value is 0.682689, which gives the same "rounded to the nearest integer" value as the one shown above.
Answer:
1
Step-by-step explanation:
