Answer:
Its 72Pi. (Option C)
Step-by-step explanation:
Took it on Edge and got it right
Answer:
7. 25% of the merchants who purchase goods from Asia also purchase from Europe.
Step-by-step explanation:
I am going to say that:
A is the percentage of merchants who purchase goods from Asia.
B is the percentage of merchants who purchase goods from Europe.
We have that:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4821d/4821d36355106ad5b965b6bbc6df687c62252dd8" alt="A = a + (A \cap B)"
In which a is the probability that a merchant purchases goods from Asia but not from Europe and
is the probability that a merchant purchases goods from both Asia and Europe.
By the same logic, we have that:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41859/4185934ee265252619d619a10a22619781bbeb5f" alt="B = b + (A \cap B)"
Which of following statement is individually sufficient to calculate what percent of the merchants in the group purchase goods from Europe but not form Asia?
We already have B.
Knowing
, that is, the percentage of those who purchase from both Asia and Europe, we can find b.
So the correct answer is:
7. 25% of the merchants who purchase goods from Asia also purchase from Europe.
The value of the Nintendo after 35 years is $2455
Since the formula f(x) = 3x² - 40x + 180 predicts the value of the Nintendo x years after 1986.
Since we require the value in 2021, x years after 1986 is 2021 - 1986 = 35 years.
Substituting x = 35 into the equation, we have
f(x) = 3x² - 40x + 180
f(x) = 3(35)² - 40(35) + 180
f(x) = 3(1225) - 40(35) + 180
f(x) = 3675 - 1400 + 180
f(x) = 2275 + 180
f(x) = 2455
So, the value of the Nintendo after 35 years is $2455
Do you think this is a realistic prediction of the value of that Nintendo?
This is not a realistic prediction for the value of the Nintendo, because, it is too high.
Learn more about quadratic equations here:
brainly.com/question/13704125
Answer:
it could be a formula ex- l times w = area
Step-by-step explanation: