Answer:
Roman gods began to more closely resemble Greek gods.
Explanation:
Roman gods were based off of Greek gods, they had the same stories cause after all Rome did come out from Greece and took many of it's traditions at the beginning of the Empire. Christianity only became the official religion of Rome towards the middle/end not the beginning. And the other two just don't sound correct, so I would go with "Roman gods began to more closely resemble Greek gods."
Sorry if I'm wrong!
Answer:
to change the appearance or guise of so as to conceal identity or mislead, as by means of deceptive garb: The king was disguised as a peasant. to conceal or cover up the truth or actual character of by a counterfeit form or appearance; misrepresent: to disguise one's intentions.
Explanation:
<span>I believe that after that day, he federal government began paying farmers to take marginal lands out of production. I hope this helped, and if so, please mark as brainliest, thank you! (:</span>
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached, we can say the following,
Yes. I think Whistler’s eccentric and intriguing public persona caused people to consider him an artistic lightweight. The reason why is that Whistler had an amicable personality that allowed him to relate with all kinds of people.
We are talking about the famous American painter and artists James A. Mc. Neill Whistler (1834-1903). He spent most of his time living in Great Britain, meanwhile in the United States was living the complex times of the Gilded Agre.
Whistler was a man that like to express his emotions through art, just for the pleasure of creation.
Answer:
Strong positive
Explanation:
In studies, we usually establish relationships between two or more variables using correlations. Correlations tell us how this variables are related.
- Two variables have a positive correlation when if one increases the other increases too.
- Two variables have a negative correlation when if one increases the other decreases and vice versa.
Also, a correlation can be weak, moderate or strong. Researchers agree that a correlation that is larger than 0.70 should be considered a strong correlation.
In this example Isabella reads about a study saying there's a correlation coefficient of +0.85 between hours spent studying and final exam grade. <u>The fact that the sign of this correlation is "+" tells us that it is positive</u> (the more hours spent studying, the better final exam grade). We can also see that <u>the coefficient is 0.85 which is greater than 0.70 and therefore we can consider this correlation as a strong one.</u>
Thus, Isabella would conclude that this is a strong positive relationship.
