While you are proofreading the text for grammar mistakes, you could evaluate the text by asking yourself the following questions.
What is the main idea?
What is the writer trying to say?
What rhetorical devices does the author use?
Did the writer organize his essay so that the reader will not be confused?
Was the writer able to bring about his point?
Did the introduction help start off the essay?
Did the writer conclude appropriately?
Did the writer use appropriate transitions to link ideas?
It will be hard evaluating and proofreading an essay at the same time as humans cannot multitask. I suggest doing them both separately.
Hey, the answer to the question would be "subordinate conjunction"
When joining two independent clauses with a comma, a subordinate conjunction needs to accompany the comma.
Answer: Benefits of vocational education
Explanation:
Dear brother,
I heard that you are having big interest in this sort of education and I was very happy to hear it. You can have many benefits when it comes to this sort of education because you will be able to see some of the technical instruments that will help you later on with your future progress. It can bring you a lot of success if you are truly willing to learn about those things. For technical and vocational education you need to make a good decision to learn about it because later it will be your job to work with vocational stuff.
Greetings and love!
Mark
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "Women are judged under laws supposedly written only for males, so they are entitled to the same rights as males." The argument is Susan B. Anthony making in the passage is that <span>Women are judged under laws supposedly written only for males, so they are entitled to the same rights as males.</span>
The point of view goes from a third person and is limited to the third person omniscient.
<u>Explanation:</u>
In the chapter, Franz Kafka The meta morphis, towards the end, there is a shift that takes place. The shift is that the view of point goes from a third person limited to the third person omniscient.
Omniscient is the person who knows every thing. So the point of view remains limited to that person only because he knows every thing already.
