Answer:
Third step: Asking whether your interpretation was correct.
Explanation:
Perception checking refers to the process by which you test if your perceptions are accurate.
Perception checking can be direct or indirect:
- Direct perception checking is simply asking other people if your perception of a situation is accurate. And it has 3 different stages or steps:
- Acknowledging the behavior you witnessed: You describe the person the behavior you saw
- Interpreting that behavior: You tell the person what you interpreted from that behavior. (what you thought it meant)
- Asking whether your interpretation was correct: You ask the person if what you actually thought was correct or not.
- Indirect perception checking: refers to using your own skills or abilities to gather more information on what you just witnessed and reach a conclusion based on that. You do not ask the person.
In the example <u>Gilberto noticed a behavior from Sara, so he asked if she was angry with him or just call. </u>
We can say that he's given an interpretation to the behavior (she's crossing her arms because she's angry or cold), but the question actually tells us <u>that he is ASKING her which one of these options is the correct one</u> (or maybe neither of them is right and there's another explanation), so he is in the third step of the direct perception checking process: Asking whether your interpretation was correct.
<span>What's a true friend?
Answer: A true friend would always have your back when being bullied, sick,or injury. When you break up with your boyf/girlf He or she will have your back and tell you, you gonna move forward with your life and never go backward.</span>
Is this question even remotely related to your syllabus??
Answer:
That statement is true
Explanation:
Patriotism means that you will fully support every action and policies that will benefit your country the most. A large portion of people interpret patriotism as completely support ALL the decisions that the government has made. This misconception is created because many of them do not realize that the government often influenced by outsiders group that act without the interest of the nation in mind.
Answer: Lenski would note that Richard’s high income but low occupational prestige demonstrates a condition of STATUS INCONSISTENCY.
Explanation: As the word inconsistency means an incompatibility between two propositions. Status inconsistency is defined as a situation whereby an individual's social position is incompatible with their social status. An example is given in the question, a janitor usually is associated with low pay. When a janitor is associated with high pay, it is termed status inconsistency. Because the social position is not compatible with the social standard.
When individuals experience status inconsistency, their likely choice of behaviiur is to claim the higher status.
