<u>Maitland and Gervis' study on goal setting and coaches found that, for goals to be effective, coaches should b</u>e engaged with the goal-setting process. The study was to use naturalistic inquiry and the social cognitive theories of motivation to identify and describe the motivational choices that players make as they go through the goal-setting process and examine the influence of the coach on this process. It means that goal-setting needs had to be examined in a broader context than goal-setting theory.
<em>In short, coaches should engage in an interactive and ongoing dialogue with players, taking into account the motivational needs of the players and their own to improve the effectiveness of setting goals as a technique, and hence their effectiveness as a coach.</em>
Answer: Internal reliability
Explanation: Internal reliability is used to evaluate the consistency of a result across items within test. In internal reliability, the consistency or how well a correlation is established between different items or variables subjected to the same test.
In the scenario above, the construct measured is aggression across multiple children using a questionnaire and the correlation or consistency of their result were evaluated.
<span>i believe it was the Harrison narcotics Act.. hope this helps</span>
Answer:
because you didn't provide enough detail for me to know what exactly you are talking about, i'll take a guess.
Explanation:
During long periods of peace, soldiers also supervised the peasants, farmers, and slaves who were involved in building such structures as pyramids and palaces. Skilled workers such as physicians and craftspersons made up the middle class. The social structures in most ancient civilizations were similar. Rulers were the highest in power. Next, it was preists or priestesses who advised the ruler. A marriage between a ruer and priestess were common. The nobles were firmly in control of society. They ran the government, owned the land, slaves, and servants. Gallup has, for a number of years, asked Americans to place themselves without any guidance into five social classes: upper, upper-middle, middle, working and lower. These five class labels are representative of the general approach used in popular language and by researchers.
