1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
AnnZ [28]
3 years ago
10

In which case would it be more dangerous to the passengers, if the cars crashed into each other and stopped right at the collisi

on site, or if they bounced off of each other
Law
1 answer:
andrew-mc [135]3 years ago
6 0

It would be more dangerous if the cars bounced off. This is because the airbags will deploy if the car stops, leaving them only with the injuries they have. However, if they bounce off, they can hit additional cars or accidently fall off a cliff. The damage opportunity is worse if they bounce off.

I hope this helps! :)

You might be interested in
Kaileb was eating a deep-fried clam fritter at Flo's Crabshack in Rhode Island (it's a real place!), when a very small piece of
Pie

i believe the correct answer is c i’m sorry if i’m wrong:(

3 0
3 years ago
Which item is an example of a primary source?
-BARSIC- [3]

Answer:

O c. A letter from an academic about her research

4 0
3 years ago
In regards to life insurance contracts, the temporary term is
Flura [38]

A because it's life insurance u gonna have to pay payments if u don't pay full ahead of time but it's life keyword life so it's permanent

4 0
2 years ago
Given the advent of good-faith exceptions to the exclusionary rule, the plain-view doctrine, and the U.S. Supreme Court's recogn
pshichka [43]

Answer:

The exclusionary rule prevents the government from using most evidence gathered in violation of the United States Constitution.  The decision in Mapp v. Ohio established that the exclusionary rule applies to evidence gained from an unreasonable search or seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment. The decision in Miranda v. Arizona established that the exclusionary rule applies to improperly elicited self-incriminatory statements gathered in violation of the Fifth Amendment, and to evidence gained in situations where the government violated the defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel.  However, the rule does not apply in civil cases, including deportation hearings. See INS v. Lopez-Mendoza.

3 0
3 years ago
The Sheriff's Department has information to believe that illegal automatic weapons are being hidden in a garage on Mary Halberst
Allushta [10]

Answer:

a. the evidence presented to the magistrate did not amount to probable cause

Explanation:

Wasnt Enough PC

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Someone please help!
    11·1 answer
  • Detective Green has been asked to collect physical evidence at a crime scene. Why would this MOST likely be difficult?
    8·2 answers
  • 4. A new agent capable of infecting mammals, birds, and certain insects has been found in approximately
    7·2 answers
  • What does the Safety Responsibility Act ensure?
    8·1 answer
  • In a few sentences, explain what the Bee Gees’ song, “Staying Alive,” has to do with CPR. be origanal
    11·1 answer
  • At a BAC of___blackouts are common.<br> A. 0.09<br> B. 0.13<br> C. 0.20
    9·1 answer
  • How does the fire department give firefighter candidates experience of a real fire?
    12·1 answer
  • How does incorporation afect federalism? Do you feel that the Bill of Rights needed to be applied to the state
    5·1 answer
  • Ipaliwanag ang consummated? ​
    15·1 answer
  • Who owns the alcoholic beverages of a private club?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!