1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
AnnZ [28]
3 years ago
10

In which case would it be more dangerous to the passengers, if the cars crashed into each other and stopped right at the collisi

on site, or if they bounced off of each other
Law
1 answer:
andrew-mc [135]3 years ago
6 0

It would be more dangerous if the cars bounced off. This is because the airbags will deploy if the car stops, leaving them only with the injuries they have. However, if they bounce off, they can hit additional cars or accidently fall off a cliff. The damage opportunity is worse if they bounce off.

I hope this helps! :)

You might be interested in
If person B kills person C because person A says " if person b doesn't kill person C then person A will kill person B and his/he
SIZIF [17.4K]

Answer:

for sure, person B wouldn't be charged with murder

Explanation:

because person B was basically forced to do it by person A, the charge would prolly go to person A

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Can someone help me with this question please.
Anika [276]

Answer: C

Explanation: The women wouldn’t be helpful cause she thought she saw a suspect but she didn’t cause she don’t remember. if she doesn’t remember then she would be useful at all

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
LkmndsjkfgharejkhbkjhfdhsdjkhasdkjhdsJHfbSFJHDf
Oksana_A [137]

Answer:

dj be djfr. eugene. wjgvsn. shcce

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
samuel, a 28 years old single taxpayer has earned income 13,690. He lived in Kansas, MO all year. He cannot be claimed as a depe
Anna [14]

Answer:

thanksgivings my teacher is the what using a little bit more

7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
When may a court rule that parol evidence might be admissible to further the court's understanding of an agreement?
Yuri [45]

Answer:

Explanation:When may a court rule that parol evidence might be admissible to further the court's understanding of an agreement?

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What gives congress power to establish post offices​
    9·1 answer
  • __________ damages are small amount of money given to recognize that a defendant did indeed commit a tort in a case in which the
    14·1 answer
  • What was one major weakness of the Articles of Confederation?
    5·1 answer
  • state four steps that can be undertaken to improve the ventilation in indoor public spaces and buildings?​
    15·1 answer
  • As you enter the expressway from the ______ lane, adjust your speed to the flow of traffic. Select a gap, signal, and check mirr
    14·1 answer
  • 3 ways political parties help citizens
    11·1 answer
  • George owns 300 shares of preferred stock in a company. By owning preferred stock, George has:
    11·1 answer
  • The life cycle of the
    8·1 answer
  • The defendant, Ms. Smith, is charged with several counts of counterfeiting. She has pleaded not guilty and asked for a jury tria
    12·1 answer
  • Why is forensic science only as good as the person conducting the science ?
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!