1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
AnnZ [28]
2 years ago
10

In which case would it be more dangerous to the passengers, if the cars crashed into each other and stopped right at the collisi

on site, or if they bounced off of each other
Law
1 answer:
andrew-mc [135]2 years ago
6 0

It would be more dangerous if the cars bounced off. This is because the airbags will deploy if the car stops, leaving them only with the injuries they have. However, if they bounce off, they can hit additional cars or accidently fall off a cliff. The damage opportunity is worse if they bounce off.

I hope this helps! :)

You might be interested in
What fear does Madison express in this passage?
Natasha_Volkova [10]
We need the passage first
8 0
3 years ago
Which of the following adjectives BEST describes an effectual, and true
Alexxandr [17]

Answer:

Constitutionalism is a political movement and philosophy that states that the ruling power is bound to respect certain rights of its subjects. According to modern constitutionalism, the form of government must be based on a constitution.  

Constitutionalism includes both the empowerment and the limitation of power, both granting power and specifying its scope and purpose. Constitutionalism is considered to promote the principles of the rule of law, the principle of predictability, and to prevent arbitrary administration of justice. According to constitutionalism, laws and judgments in countries with common law can be declared invalid because they are contrary to the constitution if it is done in accordance with the principle of transparency, usually by a constitutional court or a court with similar jurisdiction.

6 0
2 years ago
What do individual rights have to be balanced against ? Why?<br>20 points​
Vlad1618 [11]

Answer:

Individual rights are balanced against the individual rights of others, and the rights of everyone as a whole, or the common good, or basically, what benefits everyone. ... The government and courts can also use their power to keep individuals from harming the public as a whole when utilizing their individual rights.

8 0
3 years ago
What are the steps for making a smooth stop?
scZoUnD [109]

Answer:

Don't keep going

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following is the term often used by law-enforcement to describe the neighborhood of patrol officers assigned
wlad13 [49]
Answer: we need a,b,c,d to find out




Explanation: didn’t help
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What is parole? Who makes the decisions about parole?
    13·1 answer
  • Police power is:
    14·1 answer
  • Does an officer need to witness the crime to arrest an individual for a misdemeanor?
    14·2 answers
  • What can robots do that humans cannot do?
    6·2 answers
  • In 2014 the number of homicides was what percent of the total number of crimes reported
    15·1 answer
  • Will mark brainliest!!
    12·1 answer
  • For a former convict, the lifetime effects of incarceration can negatively impact _____.
    9·2 answers
  • What is the initial act of deviance that a person might commit known as?
    14·1 answer
  • A court rules that a state’s method of executing prisoners causes too much pain and must be changed. What part of the bill of ri
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements is CORRECT regarding deciding whether an alcohol sale is legal?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!