Answer: ok that’s confusing
Step-by-step explanation:
√(43) = 6.55.
-3√(2) = -4.24...
√(43) > 3.6 > -3√(2)
Answer:
D. 108.4 mm
Step-by-step explanation:
Since the larger triangle is 4 times of the small triangle...
27.1 x 4 = 108.4 mm
Answer:
9 3/4 > 9.5 > 9 3/8 > 9.125
Step-by-step explanation:
convert the fractions to decimals and put it that way
Answer: Let "T" denote households with television
"I" denote households with internet
and "N" denote households with neither of these.
Since P(N) = 0.05 then it means P(TuI) = 0.95. We know from set theory that P(TuI) = P(T) + P(I) - P(TnI). Thus,
0.95 = 0.92 + 0.72 - P(TnI) ==> P(TnI) = 0.69. This means P(T/I) = P(T) - P(TnI) = 0.92 - 0.69 = 0.23, and P(I/T) = P(I) - P(TnI) = 0.72 - 0.69 = 0.03. So,
a)
House Probability
Nothing 0.05
Only television 0.23
Only internet 0.03
Both 0.69
b) P(internet but no television) = P(only internet) = 0.03
c) P(internet | there is television) = (By Bayes' Rule) P(TnI) / P(T) = 0.69 / 0.95 = 0.726 (rounded to 3 decimal points)
d) P(internet | there is no television) = (By Bayes' Rule) P(I/T) / P(T') = 0.03 / 0.08 = 0.375
e) From (c) and (d) ==> In Canada, it is (0.726/0.375 ≈ 2 ) twice more likely that if there's television in the household, then there is internet.
Step-by-step explanation:
