B everything pretty much fell/ decreased
Answer:
d. unless the nature of the questions would raise the level of risk to more than minimal for adolescents, the research would still qualify for expedited review.
Explanation:
According to the Institutional Review Board guideline, if a study poses not more than minimal risk for it participants and meets other requirement such as not including protected classes or vulnerable populations, and not using intentional deception, the study will still qualify for expedited review. However, when vulnerable individuals are involved, a full review is required.
I don't know but I will try my best on it.
Answer:
The correct answer to the following question will be "the Korean War".
Explanation:
- A Code of Conduct seems to be a formal set of that same rules, beliefs, ideals, and standards of staff, actions, and interactions that an individual feels are essential to their successful campaign.
- This variant is something that was established after the Koreans used interrogation methods towards American POWs.
Therefore, it's the right answer.
Answer:
External Validity
Explanation:
Internal and External validity cogitate that whether or not the results of a study are meaningful. Internal validity is related to the structure of the study whereas external validity is related to how relevant is the findings of the study to the real world. Internal validity is a prerequisite to external validity, trade-off or tension between internal and external validity appear upon the analysis.
