Answer:The technique use in this study is referred to as a double blind
Explanation:
A double blind study is the one that both participants and experimenters or researchers are not made aware who is given a certain treatment.
In double blind researchers will not know if what they are receiving is part of the test itself as they interact with participants or they are receiving a placebo.
This process is useful to eliminate and avoid bias results.
For example, in the above text the effect of caffein on attention is being tested so the researchers will not know whether the drink given to them is actual for the test or just the placebo , they don't know who is in control of the experiment.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although the question does not provide any options, we can say that the ethical standard that waiting to propose the study violates is "Informed Consent to Research."
In this case, Professor Hammond, first, had to inform the students about the study she was doing so the students were aware of this situation is class. So once she notified the class about her research, then ask them their consent to participate in the study. They probably had to sign a document that serves as an agreement of their participation. The students then would be aware of the details of the research and they would decide if they want to be part of the study. That is the ethical way to proceed.
Humans because of oil spills and landfills.
Answer:
Strengthen the obligations companies have to notify customers when their personal information has been exposed.
Explanation:
The Personal Data Notification & Protection Act of 2015 is a recent legislative proposal that is being considered as a means to strengthen the obligations companies have to notify customers when their personal information has been exposed. This was a measure to protect both public and private sectors from cyber criminals, when there was a spike of this type of attacks from, allegedly, North Korea.
<span>Psychologist robert kastenbaum points out that kübler-ross' theory neglects: "certain aspects of the dying process".
Kastenbaum's Trajectories of Death Psychologist Robert Kastenbaum (1975) brings up that in spite of the fact that Kiibler-Ross' hypothesis has justify, it dismisses certain parts of the dying procedure. A standout amongst the most imperative is simply the idea of the malady, which by and large decides torment, mobility, the length of the terminal time frame.
</span>