Answer:
c. dependent variable
Explanation:
In research, the <u>independent variable</u> is the variable that can be manipulated by the researchers and which will have an effect on another variable that is called the dependent variable. (Therefore, the variable in which the affect is perceived is called the dependent variable). The researchers don't really have control over the dependent variable but it is the one that it's being tested and see how it responds to the independent variable.
In this example, the race of a criminal offender seems to determine the frequency with which capital punishment is administered. We can see that apparently, <u>the race of the criminal offender affects the punishment and how frequent it is received. </u>Therefore, since the race is affecting the frequency of the capital punishment, we can say that the punishment can be considered the dependent variable.
Research on gender differences would lead one to anticipate that Alex is "less" likely to detect faint odors and "less" likely to smile frequently than his sister Shayna.
Men and females enormously vary in their perceptual assessment of odors, with ladies outflanking men on numerous sorts of smell tests. Women’s unrivaled olfactory capacity is a fundamental characteristic that has been acquired and afterward kept up all through evolution, a thought communicated by Romanian dramatist Eugene Ionesco when he said "a nose that can see is worth two that sniff."
Answer:
classical conditioning.
Explanation:
Classical conditioning: In psychology, the term classical conditioning was proposed by one of the most influential psychologist and behaviorist named Ivan Pavlov. He has discovered the classical conditioning theory while experimenting on dogs and has included a few basic terms associated with it including unconditioned stimulus, unconditioned response, the conditioned stimulus, and conditioned response.
Classical conditioning is described as a learning theory that involves a conditioned stimulus that gives rise to a conditioned response after connecting with an unconditioned stimulus.
In the question above, the technique best illustrates the classical conditioning.
I think iys b but uam not sure
I think the correct answer from the choices listed above is option D. A strength of naturalistic observation is that it reflects participants' everyday behavior. Hope this answers the question. Have a nice day. Feel free to ask more questions.
