To the nearest ten, 829 would become <em><u>830</u></em> because the ones digit (9) is closer to 30 than it is to 20. So we would round up.
To round to the nearest hundred, we look at the tens and ones digit. 29 is less than 50 so we would have to round down to <em><u>800</u></em> instead of rounding up to 900.
Hope that helps :)
Its 27 if you’re adding at the bottom, but I cant really tell since it’s cropped
The answer is 12:1
note: this is often read as "12 to 1"
==============================================
Explanation
We have exactly four card that are labeled "3" and 52 cards total. So there are 52-4 = 48 cards that are not labeled "3".
From here you write the ratio 48:4 to indicate the odds against drawing a 3. There are 48 ways to lose, 4 ways to win. You list the number of ways to lose first when it comes to "odds against" type of problems.
Next step is to reduce the ratio 48:4 to get 12:1, note how I divided both parts by the GCF 4
48/4 = 12
4/4 = 1
So thats how 48:4 reduces to 12:1
If you focus on one suit, say the spades, then we have 12 cards that arent a 3 of spades while exactly one card is a 3 of spades. This is one way to see why 12:1 is the answer. If you were saying this out loud to a friend, then you might say something like "the odds against drawing a three are 12 to 1".
All you do is change signs write 2x minus 14 equals negative 10-14 equals four then you write 2x over two equals four over two then u write x equals negative two
