Answer:
presumptuous
Explanation:
it's what you call someone who assumes something
Answer:
- <u>The water ballon that was thrown straight down at 2.00 m/s hits the ground first, 0.19 s before the other ballon.</u>
Explanation:
The motions of the two water ballons are ruled by the kinematic equations:
We are only interested in the vertical motion, so that equation is all what you need.
<u>1. Water ballon is thrown horizontally at sped 2.00 m/s.</u>
The time the ballon takes to hit the ground is independent of the horizontal speed.
Since 2.00 m/s is a horizontal speed, you take the initial vertical speed equal to 0.
Then:

<u>2. Water ballon thrown straight down at 2.00 m/s</u>
Now the initial vertical speed is 2.00 m/s down. So, the equation is:

To solve the equation you can use the quadratic formula.

You get two times. One of the times is negative, thus it does not have physical meaning.
<u>3. Conclusion:</u>
The water ballon that was thrown straight down at 2.00 m/s hits the ground first by 1.11 s - 0.92s = 0.19 s.
They have solid, rocky surfaces they also have molten heavy-metal core, few moons , and topological features
Answer: option c.
Explanation: 3 identical resistors can only have 3 configurations
1) all 3 resistors in series
2) all 3 resistors in parallel
3) 2 parallel resistors in series with 1 resistor.
Case 1 : all 3 resistors in series
Let us assume each of the resistor has resistance value R.
The total resistor (Rt) of 3 resistors in series is given as
Rt = R1 + R2 + R3
Since R1=R2=R3=R
Rt = R+R+R = 3R.
Case 2: all 3 resistors in parallel.
The equivalent resistance of resistors in parallel is given by the formulae below.
1/Rt = 1/R1 + 1/R2 + 1/R3
Since R1=R2=R3=R
1/Rt = 1/R + 1/R + 1/R
1/Rt = 1 +1 +1/ R
1/Rt = 3/R
3 * Rt = R
Rt = R/3
Case 3: 2 parallel resistor in series with one
First is to get the equivalent resistance of the 2 parallel resistor.
1/Rt = 1/R1 + 1/R2
But R1=R2=R
1/Rt = 1/R + 1/R
1/Rt = 1 + 1/R
1/Rt = 2/R
2 *Rt = R
Rt =R/2.
R/2 in series with R has an equivalent resistance as shown below
Rt = R/2 + R
Rt = R + 2R/2
Rt = 3R/2
Since all the possible 3 configuration are listed above and there is no other then option c ( 2R/3) is not possible to achieve
Answer:
making sure that you change one factor at a time while keeping all other conditions the same
Explanation: