Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
I think this is your full question, right?
<em>Cindy and Zoey work at a store. Both girls earn $6.25 per hour. During a normal week Cindy works 15 hours and Zoey works 20 hours. The expression 6.25(15) + 6.25(20) can be used to calculate the total amount of money that the girls earned in one week. Which expression shows another way to calculate the amount of money the girls earn in one week? </em>
My answer:
The expression shows another way must be equal to: <em>6.25(15) + 6.25(20) </em>
<=> 6.25 (15+20)
Because both girls earn the same per hour.
Using multiplication signal rules, it is found that:
A: Emma's statement is always false.
B: The result is always negative.
C: Emma's statement is always true.
The rule used for this exercise is as follows:
- When two numbers of different signals are multiplied, the result is negative.
- When two numbers have the same signal, the result is positive.
Part A:
- Three numbers are multiplied, all negative.
- The multiplication of the first two result in a positive number.
- Then, this positive number is multiplied by a negative number, and the result will be negative, which mean that Emma's statement is always false.
Two examples are:
Part B:
The rule is that the result is always negative.
Part C:
- The multiplication of the first two negative numbers result in a positive number.
- Then, this positive number is multiplied by another positive number, and the result will be positive, which mean that Emma's statement is always true.
Two examples are:
A similar problem is given at brainly.com/question/24764960
21 because it is being multiplied
You have not given us any of the steps that Ricardo took to simplify the
expression, and you also haven't given us the list of choices that includes
the description of his mistake, so you're batting O for two so far.
Other than those minor details, the question is intriguing, and it certainly
draws me in.
If Ricardo made a mistake in simplifying that expression, I'm going to say that
it was most likely in the process of removing the parentheses in the middle.
Now you understand that this is all guess-work, because of all the stuff that you
left out when you copied the question, but I think he probably forgot that the 3x
operates on everything inside the parentheses.
He probably wrote that 3x (x-3) is
either 3x² - 3
or x - 9x .
In reality, when properly simplified,
3x (x - 3) = 3x² - 9x .
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Use the table to find the slope and y-intercept
<u>Find the slope:</u>
- m = (6 - 4)/(3 - 1) = 2/2 = 1
<u>Find b using the pair (1, 4):</u>
- 4 = 1*1 + b
- b = 4 - 1
- b = 3
<u>The line is:</u>
The y-intercept is 3
