Answer: She has 21.63 more euros than pounds and has 1.23 times more euros than pounds.
Step-by-step explanation:
She has US$300, and she will withdraw half of it on pounds, and half of it in euros.
(half of US$300 is US$150)
We know that:
1 pound = US$1.6
(1 pound/US$1.6) = 1
Then US$150 = US$150*(1 pound/US$1.6) = (150/1.6) pounds = 93.75 pounds.
And we also know that:
1 euro = US$ 1.3
then:
(1 euro/US$ 1.3) = 1
This means that:
US$150 = US$150*(1 euro/US$ 1.3) = (150/1.3) euros = 115.38 euros.
This means that:
115.38 - 93.75 = 21.63
This means that she has 21.63 more euros than pounds.
and:
115.38/93.75 = 1.23
She has 1.23 times more euros than pounds.
Answer:
Table B
Table C
Table A
Step-by-step explanation:
Substitute by the easiest number which is 0
f(0) =2(0) - (-3) =3 Then it is Table B function
f(0) = -2(0) +(-1/3)= -1/3 Then it is Table C function
f(0) =2(0) +(2/3)=2/3 Then it is Table A function
Answer:
No, equivalent quarterly rate will be approx 1.75%
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that Chan deposited money into his retirement account that is compounded annually at an interest rate of 7%.
We know that there are 4 quarters in 1 year.
So to find that equivalent quarterly we will divide given yearly rate by number of quarters.
That means divide 7% by 4.
which gives 1.75%.
But that is different than Chan's though of 2% quarterly interest.
Hence Chan is wrong.
Answer:
thank u
Step-by-step explanation:
it is 100 times greater because it is two places higher than 57,080
