Incomplete question. The remaining part of the question reads;
The city of Beautifica has established a lovely park in the city. The city council wishes to preserve some elements of nature, undisturbed by city noise, traffic, pollution, and crowding. The park is a place where citizens can go and find grass, trees, flowers, and quiet. In addition, there are playgrounds and picnic areas, and at one time a road ran through the park. Now the road is closed. The city council has enacted a law requiring that all entrances to the park have the following signposted: NO VEHICLES IN THE PARK.
<em>The law seems clear, but some disputes have arisen over its interpretation. Interpret the law in the following cases, keeping in mind what the law says (the letter of the law) as well as the legislative intent. Examine the situation and decide whether or not the vehicle described should be allowed in the park. </em>
Tony lives on one side of the city and works on the other. He will save ten minutes if he drives through the park.
Answer:
<u>Tony should not be allowed.</u>
Explanation:
We can make this conclusion because Tony's reasons constitute part of the reasons why the park was closed from vehicles; in other to be undisturbed by traffic or pollution from vehicles.
Hence, it will be reasonable for Tony to use other means of transportation such as a bicycle to go through the park.
Ei primeiro você tem que explicar
Answer: 1. an individual can be driving below the speed limit and you are behind them then you could possibly get enraged and start honking 2. an individual can make a face at you at the red light and then you get upset 3. an individual behind you can start honking at you for no reason 4. you can have personal issues going on at home and then you get on the road and emotions get involved 5. you get inpatient 6. you could be trying to switch lanes and another individual won't let you get by 7. another individual doesn't turn their blinker on to turn 8. someone could be looking at their phone... A simple solution to "road rage" is being patient and watching your surroundings
Explanation:
I personally disagree with the Electoral College. It was a system that worked 200 years ago. The system now just doesn’t work because we have all these things like mail in voting, claimed election fraud, etc. Not only that but the electoral college could have a bias against a candidate. If you look at Hilary Clinton for example. She ran for President in 2016 but ended up losing the Electoral College vote but won the popular vote. Now she is an electoral college member which obviously, she wouldn’t vote for trump. The only reason the Electoral College is because the original framers said that the president and Vice President should be decided by a set group of people. Which today, is the Electoral College. Hope this helps!
Answer:
pre-twentieth-century, East Coast, urban gangs in the United States
Explanation: