The correct answer is - A. All dogs are mammals. Peanut is a dog. Hence, Peanut is a mammal.
The inductive reasoning in essence is a method of reasoning is which the premises are viewed as providing some evidence for what is the truth of the conclusion.
In this case, ''all dogs are mammals'' gives us the basis for the conclusion. There's a dog named Peanut, and since all dogs are mammals, Peanut is mammal too because it is a dog. In the first part of the sentence we have a premise that gives us an evidence, which put together with the description gives us the conclusion, or rather gives us truthful conclusion.
Yes , it would relax you but it would cause lung problems and it won’t make you a better skateboarder , just keep practicing.
Hi !
This laboratory test indicates which of the following?
<em>A. Her glucose control is poor. </em>
<em />
<em />
<em>The hemoglobin A1C, used to follow glucose control, measures the average glu- cose levels over the previous 2 or 3 months. The hemoglobin A1C goal for most diabetics is 6% to 9%. Levels greater than 12% suggest poor control, and levels 9% to 12% represent fair control. </em>
