Only selections B and D give a maximum height of 13 at t=3. However, both of those functions have the height be -5 at t=0, meaning the ball was served from 5 ft below ground. This does not seem like an appropriate model.
We suspect ...
• the "correct" answers are probably B and D
• whoever wrote the problem wasn't paying attention.
Answer:
<u></u>
- <u>She should aim 6 feet down the wall</u>
Explanation:
The diagram attached sketches the situtation.
Since the angle with which the ball hits the wall is the same with which it bounces, angle β is the same for the two shown triangles.
Then, since both are right triangles, then all the angles are congruent and the triangles are similar. Hence, you can equal the ratios of the sides, to make an equation:
You have other equation:
Substitute
- 2y + y = 18
- 3y = 18
- y = 18/3
- y = 6 ← this is the distance down the wall where the ball should hit
Then, she should aim 6 feet down the wall.
Answer:
Commutative property and associative properties are mixed up.
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
1 3/4 miles
Step-by-step explanation:
2 1/2+ 1 3/4= 4 1/4
6-4 1/4= 1 3/4
I believe that answer is 54
