I believe the answer is: Deductive argument
In deductive argument,we make<span> the conclusion by </span>reductively<span> by applying general rules to narrow potential possibilities until there is one possibility remains. Deductive argument is considered to be using 'top-down logic' and most commonly used in an investigative process.</span>
The Third Amendment states that soldiers cannot live in citizens' homes without the owners' consent. In today's time, soldiers no longer need shelter so desperately as to ask citizens for quartering room. This amendment was only created because during the American Revolution, British soldiers barged into colonists' homes and stayed there for shelter without the citizens' assent.
D.High levels of inflation that made money worthless
Answer:
The correct answer is A, to form a colony that serparatedchurch and state.
Explanation:
He had a major disagreement with the church leader and left.
This is the kind of concept a utilitarian would agree on. If the result is positive for a large group of people, we should seriously consider doing it.
However, I would like to comment on this concept. In my opinion (and that's what you're asking for) there are situations in which the ends don't justify the means. You can e.g. think about mass-bombings to fight against terrorism. However, the possibility exists that innocent people will be hit, and will die. Therefore, the end don't always justify the means (in my opinion).
