Answer:
This scenario is an example of a self-fulfilling prophecy
Explanation:
A Self-Fulfilling Prophecy is simply having an idea,notion, expectation or a view about an individual or anything and most times these individuals or entities ends up behaving in the way we thought about them because we believe they will( result in the other person or entity acting in ways that confirm the views or expectations). it is a sociopsychological phenomenon.
Self fulfilling proheccy can also be describe as prediction or fortune telling. it is our beliefs and expectations been affected or influenced by our behavior at the subconscious level. AN example of this prophecy is when John thinks his son will kill him in future and ends up leaving his son in the forest for wild animals to devour. the child ends up been rescued by a passerby and raise up by the rescuer. in future time, the child ends up accidentally killing his own father without knowing who he really was.
Answer:
Slaves where guaranteed freedom for fighting with the patriots
Explanation:
The slaves had a reward of freedom from their owners for fighting the patriots
Condensation if I'm not mistaking.
Answer:
The torch is a symbol of enlightenment. The Statue of Liberty's torch lights the way to freedom showing us the path to Liberty. Even the Statue's official name represents her most important symbol "Liberty Enlightening the World".
Answer:
The answer to this question, and especially the text that your question aludes to, can be found on the lumenlearning website, and it says this: that all beings have a three-step process of learning that explains how an organism develops the capacities to behave and act accordingly, depending on the conditions around it. These three steps are: classical conditioning (Pavlovian conditioning), operant conditioning, and finally, observation. All organisms go through these steps to learn how to behave and act in an environment.
Classical conditioning is simply the way that an organism is taught how to respond by association. As an organism experiences its environment, it observes different events and learns how to associate cause and consequence, or responses, to stimuli. During operant conditioning, an organism also associates and also learns that producing a behavior brings either reward, or punishment, and observation is how an organism learns to act through observation and imitation of others.
To me, learning is a much more complex process, in which, all the experiences taken in by an organism, the environment, and also genetics, play all a role together in the way this organism processes all and acquires knowledge and produces responses to that knowledge. But I agree with these theories that all organisms go through steps. You see it with babies. They first learn to act through what they observe, but as intelligent and sapient beings, they too can learn to produce behavior outside of what was observed, or conditioned in them. So, in animals and other beings the three steps mentioned above might work, but not necessarily in humans.
Explanation:
